Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-07

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 22 July 2011 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4E521F85B9 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.285, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uFLy9McJqY1d for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EBA21F858C for <codec@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=2951; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1311343019; x=1312552619; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wBDTIDRVM/78iKnhGbKj8tfAa0IZULeaic/wsx0qfPI=; b=dvYwdjLsqCw35SuqlgycBc/cF4z1At85SqdmlRnVCXN9WJ9sfilVR7w3 HpRTbBeH9T9gkJv/31GlAIVjznK/tfpDSaFV8zTswd2Go2SaT1jsYNKJ6 Yv+M7Bo+R1nW2RbVkslI5VBKXvVDYjBBNAWwXxoD6XPITowuDZdKWvI/u w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAFSBKU6rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABTp0l3iHwEnQieM4VgXwSHVYsZkH8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,247,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="5492725"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2011 13:56:58 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn2-574.cisco.com (sjc-vpn2-574.cisco.com [10.21.114.62]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6MDuvVL023214; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:56:58 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgjPJ8dbb1wSyU4zVS-mhvCdeUYrSibOpB=9rAXSY40oLCJAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:56:57 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <61AC1718-694E-45D9-9E0E-4CB0352F2645@cisco.com>
References: <D0DF9C6A-8344-46CF-A8E3-E2BA90EC2149@cisco.com><4E26B5E3.8070107@jdrosen.net> <CAFgjPJ8dbb1wSyU4zVS-mhvCdeUYrSibOpB=9rAXSY40oLCJAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jehan_Pag=E8s?= <jehan.marmottard@gmail.com>, Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-07
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:57:00 -0000

Christian (CC'd) set up a mailing list for people to discuss the patents. I forget the exact location but perhaps he can send a pointer to the list.

The conversation I want us to avoid is discussing if the IPR is claims are valid or not - it's not a topic the IETF takes on but clearly the IETF does want people to be aware that the claims exist and that people have to make their own decisions about claims. I imagine people feeling about the claims will factor into their opinions about if they think the draft is worth publishing as an RFC or not. Stephan is our IPR advisor for this group so hopefully if I said something wrong here he can correct me - he understands all of this better than I do.

Cullen
 
On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:27 , Jehan Pagès wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I know that we are not supposed to discuss patents issues on this list
> (according to an email on 25th of May by Cullen Jennings).
> But considering that Opus is closing last call, and I have no idea
> where else I could get the information (Cullen's email mentioned
> possibility of creating a new list for this, but it seems it never get
> created, or else not announced here), I am sorry by advance for
> asking. But what is the status of the IPR claims of patents which were
> issued on previous drafts?
> Thanks.
> 
> Jehan
> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@jdrosen.net> wrote:
> > A reminder that there are three days remaining in this working group last
> > call.
> >
> > Please send comments by the end of day on July 23.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan R.
> >
> > On 7/8/2011 11:38 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> >>
> >> The authors believe the draft is pretty much done other than editorial
> >> stuff so we would like to initiate a working group last call on
> >> draft-ietf-codec-opus-07 to help gather any remaining issues.
> >>
> >> The draft can be found at
> >>  http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-codec-opus-07.txt
> >>
> >> I would like to note that even if no issues are raised during this WGLC,
> >> the chairs will delay requesting publication at the end of the WGLC to make
> >> sure there is time for appropriate communications with other SDOs.
> >>
> >> Please send comment by the end of the day on July 23.
> >>
> >> Thank you, Cullen&  Jonathan
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   SkypeID: jdrosen
> > Skype Chief Technology Strategist
> > jdrosen@skype.net                              http://www.skype.com
> > jdrosen@jdrosen.net                            http://www.jdrosen.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > codec mailing list
> > codec@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
> >
> 


Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html