Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> Mon, 24 September 2012 13:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E8721F854C for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.714
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.714 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EyiUQGv07Kul for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F4521F8613 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:64:42:a9bc:dfa8:6e29:70ac] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:64:42:a9bc:dfa8:6e29:70ac]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7741113FAA4 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:41 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1348492241; bh=fjrnnoOjTSR4c8cO8Q2WwU4MAYHK1HL63AzYMoCZ7XI=; h=From:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References: To:In-Reply-To; b=cqF3NjELqla9hXYDswHZ4y++4ntoYpA1CuCcyQQkDARpKEwTeCIFNMp3cPetR8VWM hlo83gKknpRRwl2e/GRaFSH1QEz923DypnLkABsqms5FNzciD4do73/oB+pKKAZc7+ AjhReuwJTzY/QCEdo0lxXqgTvGlF8liNbCVn/KMY=
From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F43F04F2-C34A-4800-A750-A8498F7BE3FC"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Message-Id: <FBCB9053-91C3-4EBC-874E-97067A922E49@nic.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:41 +0200
References: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz>
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:10:47 -0000
More specifically, we are going to cancel the session after Oct 4th unless we hear from you that you want to meet and we have an agenda. O. On 23. 9. 2012, at 12:28, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote: > Dear WG, > > we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite unsure if there's enough interest in meeting. > > I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for next year. > > Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda item suggestion :))? > > O. > -- > Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer > ------------------------------------------- > CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC > Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic > mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ > tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 > ------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > dane@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane -- Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer ------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 -------------------------------------------
- [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet or no… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… SM
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Daniel Piggott
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Jim Schaad
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York