Re: [dane] IETF 85

On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote:

> More specifically, we are going to cancel the session after Oct 4th unless we hear from you that you want to meet and we have an agenda.
> 

Apologies all -- due to the contention for meeting slots and the difficulty of scheduling all these slots we are moving the cutoff to the 2nd.

W

> O.
> 
> On 23. 9. 2012, at 12:28, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote:
> 
>> Dear WG,
>> 
>> we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite unsure if there's enough interest in meeting.
>> 
>> I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for next year.
>> 
>> Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda item suggestion :))?
>> 
>> O.
>> --
>> Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer
>> -------------------------------------------
>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratoře CZ.NIC
>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
>> tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
>> -------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dane mailing list
>> dane@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
> 
> --
> Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer
> -------------------------------------------
> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratoře CZ.NIC
> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
> tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?