IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?

Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> Sun, 23 September 2012 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8902A21F8425 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 03:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Hk8x25gdNgJ for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 03:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FD621F84C9 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 03:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-27-89.ripemtg.ripe.net (dhcp-27-89.ripemtg.ripe.net [193.0.27.89]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5041E14047B for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:28:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1348396085; bh=Xm7YTkKkfYJ3Ws0qwmrq2Zpps29nGRZj+SfFDqEcHTY=; h=From:Content-Type:Subject:Message-Id:Date:To:Mime-Version; b=WYR8MHVz0l83gC/QYgUqXzwFIx236eL/H47+9nRkaTXFWkzcBa6YGoAEi//Nx972E 5z1JX2di3wRWe6wWA6P5dzPqc4gIh0x6h2KStzx9A1xPPB+sczNcO0tA0WauBq+d0o j+Q6ZsfwwOu8MwffwnOacSbDBOhceLYETqvmrAN0=
From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_67320362-37CE-453E-8B55-49013EEA27BF"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Message-Id: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:28:04 +0200
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:28:09 -0000

Dear WG,

we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite unsure if there's enough interest in meeting.

I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for next year.

Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda item suggestion :))?

O.
--
 Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer
 -------------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratoře CZ.NIC
 Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
 mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
 tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
 -------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email