Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 03 December 2013 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37DF1AE11C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:49:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vHCpt9pnkcgC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com (exprod7og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B47E1AE11A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUp3vaN9/DSOUrXoHbfjvbDXHojDzTDQE@postini.com; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:49:13 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1A21B82B9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3F4190043; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:49:12 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <03FEB951-90D6-4DAF-9793-76ACFD1A30D3@employees.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:49:09 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EB5FEBF0-476C-42C3-A2EC-8B51CCB30011@nominum.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADA99A8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>, <3219ECB2-F220-403B-984B-7254677528DE@employees.org> <70E0AB50-27FB-4388-96DB-F46D260E553B@cisco.com>, <77AB54E8-7150-49DC-A9B6-65CFCDA0D28A@employees.org> <EB4A3EBF-B08F-4465-A69B-63325E2E3EDA@cisco.com> <03FEB951-90D6-4DAF-9793-76ACFD1A30D3@employees.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:49:17 -0000

On Dec 3, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> it appears you think it is important that DHCPv4 uses "only IPv6 packets". that's what a tunnel does, why do you think DHCPv4 needs to build its own transport?

Ole, this is a straw-man argument.   Nobody ever said that.   I would hate to see the working group try to argue this point.   Please try to stick to arguing about things people have actually said, or you are just creating useless noise and wasting peoples' valuable time.