Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Thu, 28 November 2013 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8982A1ADDD0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:27:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSyyBIKzZ48Q for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FE41A1F5D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:80c2:6a7f:5bd6:784f]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DA0D468EE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <52976EDC.3040803@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:27:08 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <CEBB74DD.9C090%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <124F1F54-5997-46D9-A6F1-54F94E3D6423@gmail.com> <5295FCDD.9000300@viagenie.ca> <51308BAA-5F33-44B9-AB72-6AE42BA5E11D@gmail.com> <5296356D.90405@viagenie.ca> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC24C4@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC25C8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAF+sHxHSrZ5zEXrn0RpZqCUcfJ3xiisgFYKLCo5adBcMP3rGzA@mail.gmail.com> <6D0BACEB-D945-413B-98D9-3333092F45F6@cisco.com> <CAF+sHxGCk0hG2U+qMc+b=uk90c+c-4_WTJp-mxLLe-Vx_tuwCQ@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC41A3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC41A3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:27:11 -0000

Le 2013-11-28 11:20, Bernie Volz (volz) a écrit :
> The Server-Unicast option (if this is adopted) would be in the
> BOOTREPLYV6 which is processed by the 4o6 DHCP Client and does not
> impact the normal DHCPv6 transactions. (The 4o6 DHCP Client would
> request this in the ORO in the BOOTREQUESTV6.)
>
> I’m not sure if this is worth it. But just figured I’d suggest it.

My take: it's an interesting potential optimization, but it seems we 
don't really know if we need it or not. When in doubt, leave it out.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca