IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Fri, 06 December 2013 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA431ADF9D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:09:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6lSazLFbHdk for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:09:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1651ADF43 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:09:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,841,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="1177609"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2013 14:09:16 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-103-53.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-103-53.cisco.com [10.61.103.53]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB6E9CQg010688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:09:13 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6AB0AC5-8FED-46F4-B6DC-14AC6F4150FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <77AB54E8-7150-49DC-A9B6-65CFCDA0D28A@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:09:11 +0100
Message-Id: <E69EB59A-B0BD-479A-B392-1E24C1C868E5@employees.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADA99A8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>, <3219ECB2-F220-403B-984B-7254677528DE@employees.org> <70E0AB50-27FB-4388-96DB-F46D260E553B@cisco.com> <77AB54E8-7150-49DC-A9B6-65CFCDA0D28A@employees.org>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:09:22 -0000

>> We are trying to solve the general problem when all that can be assured is the ability to send IPv6 packets.
> 
> I have asked multiple times for an explanation of what you are trying to achieve, and what makes this a "general problem".

anyone with an answer to this?

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email