Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

Branimir Rajtar <Branimir.Rajtar@t.ht.hr> Thu, 28 November 2013 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Branimir.Rajtar@t.ht.hr>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DC81AE020 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 05:34:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Aucg7hK3RXE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 05:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx01.t.ht.hr (mx01.t.ht.hr [195.29.161.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4FD1AD947 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 05:34:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw.ad.local (unknown [172.17.66.76]) by mx01.t.ht.hr with smtp id 0ff3_1f83_1754a527_c4d4_4233_a8dd_66bde23ae709; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:34;
Received: from S2010EXCHCA2.ad.local ([10.240.132.165]) by mailgw.ad.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:34;
Received: from S2010EXCH1.ad.local ([fe80::2d7b:39dd:876e:f277]) by S2010EXCHCA2.ad.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:34;
From: Branimir Rajtar <Branimir.Rajtar@t.ht.hr>
To: "ian.farrer@telekom.de" <ian.farrer@telekom.de>, "volz@cisco.com" <volz@cisco.com>, "simon.perreault@viagenie.ca" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, "sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com" <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
Thread-Index: Ac7sC27FaFr9M80rSoeB8BYOw5JWzQAMtQmg
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:34:13 +0000
Message-ID: <786F13AA11E69F4DB2CCA23F7400C2FB1F10FD85@S2010EXCH1.ad.local>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC24C4@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CEBCAEF4.9DB34%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
In-Reply-To: <CEBCAEF4.9DB34%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, hr-HR
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.10.22]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2013 13:34:14.0258 (UTC) FILETIME=[874F6D20:01CEEC3E]
X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1
X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:34:20 -0000

> +1. Definitely prefer a single option for this.

I totally agree, in my opinion, it's always good to make it as simple as possible, especially since it's already quite hard to keep track of everything...

Branimir
 

> 
> 
> On 27/11/2013 20:24, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> >I had suggested (perhaps privately) that at least in my mind, having a
> >single option would be so much better.
> >
> >The option can return a list of N IPv6 addresses where N can be 0.
> >
> >If the option is returned with no IPv6 addresses, then it means enabled
> >but with standard multicast.
> >
> >If the option is returned with one or more addresses, then it means
> >sent to those addresses (whether unicast or multicast - why does the
> >sender care).
> >
> >If the option is NOT returned, it means that the service is disabled.
> >
> >Now, one issue against this is that it may be a bit unusual for servers
> >to support an option with 0 or more IPv6 addresses? If that is a
> >problem for a particular server, then one possibility is just configure
> >it with one address - the All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers. (I don't
> >see a reason to prohibit this value from being included; it just isn't
> >required as it can be implied by sending no addresses.)
> >
> >- Bernie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg


<HTML><P><FONT face=Arial color=#999999 size=1>

IZJAVA O ODRICANJU ODGOVORNOSTI: Sadržaj ove poruke i eventualno priloženih datoteka je povjerljiv i namijenjen je samo osobama ili subjektima koji su navedeni u adresi. Ukoliko ste primili ovu poruku greškom, molimo Vas, obavijestite pošiljatelja, a poruku i sve njene privitke odmah, bez čitanja, trajno uklonite s računala. Bilo kakvo prenošenje, kopiranje ili distribucija informacija sadržanih u poruci trećim osobama je zabranjeno i može biti zakonski kažnjivo. Sadržaj, stavovi i mišljenja izneseni u poruci su autorovi i ne predstavljaju nužno stavove HT - Hrvatskih telekomunikacija d.d. HT ne prihvaća nikakvu odgovornost za eventualnu štetu nastalu primitkom ove poruke i priloga sadržanih u poruci.

</FONT></P><P><FONT face=Arial color=#999999 size=1>

 DISCLAIMER:The contents of this email as well as any files attached to it are confidential and intended solely for individuals or entities which they are addressed to. If you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender and permanently remove the message and all attached files from the computer. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of all or a part of information contained herein to or by third parties is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this message are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Croatian Telecom Inc. Croatian Telecom Inc. accepts no liability for any potential damage caused by this message and files attached to it.

</FONT></P></HTML>