IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 24 August 2016 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BAD12D69E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.068
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2o0gVN1q4sEP for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F54812D674 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2961; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472067969; x=1473277569; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=1CjLzoAE1e6KVnT+Ar/CqwrAPzrnJDf+MHyIhtY94P8=; b=kgFioe+y8CDPsZcJwiW5yWe/1lTLTp+VTPmPU4JSzVbxWRcMRnmxZ5M1 9PyznD7PNhKZ3VZQe6QiKGdRFaPeiP1+WoBIAbr0pkVgzMW1HzFqrrika tYGikNEjuUFaKtOYLdot5pAXqJVIGuPC0cPmctc/6L2sN2AA+gnbWWDY/ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CkAgCW+L1X/4ENJK1cgykBAQEBAR5WfLMGhQiBfiSFeQKBTTgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RiAQV5EAIBCAQBOgcyFBECBA4FiDIOvzUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYglCIJNhBIRAYNJgi8FmUgBhh+Cf4YDj1CMQIN4AR42g31wAYY3gh8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,572,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="141339630"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Aug 2016 19:46:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7OJk8f0019279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:46:08 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:46:07 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:46:07 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
Thread-Index: AQHR9NA4CHku5xpnb0Wx+Hz1v40PpaBGDGeAgAA+lwCAAAn1AIAEKdgAgAH3pgCAAcHfgIABdYgAgAADMICAAPbYAIAGuH0AgAAcCACAAGAdAIAAvucAgAAFvoCAABCsgIAAAW4AgAANBwCAABPxgP//wnaG
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:46:07 +0000
Message-ID: <122453F6-3987-46D4-89EB-84AF99402BC3@cisco.com>
References: <92dcf2e0cf08452caa5861f7258ea6c5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <201608121919.u7CJJqcS056876@givry.fdupont.fr> <c5303eef3c124228825f32a40f229107@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ccaff4d4cb5c4eefb05eee0660c2611c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <f46aa91e4cfb41b29dd2d8186f5959f8@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ba1c8ff573d7466b8c437373e05f1023@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <b65e1dd66b634240b3ca164b2c04c20a@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqfb5sxOpkTEXkwZXckKBWof7U1-W6EFzCHk7ijnMjpMMA@mail.gmail.com> <5ec83aaf4e76497aa4b4d465483bdcf5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqeKqEgLVC2ZZyUCjsrPP5_suRJ8en2NC+g13Q5PyQL1iw@mail.gmail.com> <30c9413c4662476096ef087ac88f6314@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <dc9d2c300d574732a12f7f366f6223c0@XCH15-05-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <3A5F0B79-8C76-4E82-97E9-FA63657DE6C3@cisco.com> <CAJ3w4NdjgVxvnvuaWjGM=qtOe0qUq4N96fVXsbNrf=YkhiABbQ@mail.gmail.com> <2f45b99b50f84b1280e92ad824e39e26@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <9E9A9543-ECB0-4D99-A00F-1AAD813B6522@fugue.com> <091180442e44490ba451874d1543f814@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAPt1N1=pD7TBrU_NnuyGz61+CiUVp0JiyLLfMUKTz_dgnO59QQ@mail.gmail.com> <AF387F3E-1B64-4E5D-BAF7-EB5BF3ED1EB4@cisco.com>, <55dcbc0cd1484fffa264b18b2fc3322c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <55dcbc0cd1484fffa264b18b2fc3322c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_122453F6398746D489EB84AF99402BC3ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/npkKabD5aI4LvJwQESqHtl44XUY>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:46:11 -0000

Note that latest version of that draft is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-04.

Also, 03 used the https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-02 draft to address out of order issues. Don't recall why 04 removed this and whether there were other issues still unresolved - though I think there were.

Sadly there is no change log to indicate changes made in each rev, so we will need to review the email dialog and meeting minutes around the time of these drafts to determine open issues & how to move forward. I think interest died because cable (cmts) just started to snoop the client packets. This actually doesn't resolve out of order issues, though I think those have not caused any known problems. So while in theory they could be, in practice they are not.

- Bernie (from iPhone)

On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com<mailto:Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>> wrote:

draft-draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-00.txt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email