Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D82611E809C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cma0T4lVd1uu for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1A611E8097 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1080; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1346217026; x=1347426626; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rP+S/bE1NL90ZdvsJQ9+xY/kG4qUoQWpMnfWiRjPgpY=; b=l7zJgj3/Tx9uYGdxZHrhWBELPLpeHyDm/gLpX+EID1/ksm1YMue1yx2N qfIb3V56Zxv+/MBOttpaEdUZR2aRe3p2AaYTofSyWHK1rNR13sr8n+zGQ SOW9jce7mc3+x32LA1TSSsXOYH48rIHki0Lt+1MWMDzlS7e1E/BMCJSXj g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAKyiPVCtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABFun6BB4IgAQEBBAEBAQ8BJzQXBAIBCA4DBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAgQBEggBGYdrC5wJoE6LCIV5YAOkBIFngmM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,332,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="113251202"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2012 05:10:26 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7T5APYJ016083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:10:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.159]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:10:25 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
Thread-Index: AQHNhTu/UoFdx/X410eNxzRZgWx7TpdwPQBQ
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:10:24 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4F3093@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <CAL10_Bqa4ftiVhyyf0ezwKR7mzAEOLNi_K3EJFPFUzPnz7QGPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL10_Bqa4ftiVhyyf0ezwKR7mzAEOLNi_K3EJFPFUzPnz7QGPw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.89.13.162]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19146.004
x-tm-as-result: No--31.658900-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:10:32 -0000

Looks fine to me ... you beat me to doing this draft.

One thought I had, especially regarding the DUID-UUID, was to drop the first two octets (DUID-Type) from the hashing as that allows coverage of the full UUID. Also, the DUID-Type field hardly seems worth hashing - as there's unlikely to be much, if any, variability in that data (at best the values would be 00-01, 00-02, 00-03, or 00-04 today).

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andre Kostur
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 12:40 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

Dear all:

I have submitted a new I-D updating RFC 3074 to apply to DHCPv6.

The text is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kostur-dhc-loadbv6-00.txt

Comments and suggestions welcome.   I am looking to have the WG take
this on as a work item.

--
Andre Kostur
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg