IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Updated PERC Charter proposal

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0011A90CF for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pPJUh7oIbd4P for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3801D1A8706 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t54KCPaD053823 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:12:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:12:25 -0500
Message-ID: <780FAA10-DE23-49C2-BB7E-5DB92AC2208F@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <006d01d09e5a$b0410200$10c30600$@co.in>
References: <CAHBDyN6BeyL-wh_=t7jN+tfhTTnZK0uTBra-F7MR11x9eFkGpg@mail.gmail.com> <D188F24E.14D48%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com> <55683230.3020600@ericsson.com> <CAHBDyN68U=KiyM8aTzbmmFzN9cZJ_MgZs00VPCODyufMn=JpUA@mail.gmail.com> <556C2A44.8010805@ericsson.com> <D193CBFB.32759%rmohanr@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMGUG0A8ypCz2kF8hqfsKemXK4CX8ujLFOi2HjGWunJ9g@mail.gmail.com> <556DDC0C.3010107@andyet.net> <CABcZeBPtc-Wp=4WSc_NXCZM+SSY6o0eFDbnPE+zCLTB_LY7PvQ@mail.gmail.com> <556DF837.8050704@alum.mit.edu> <D1946A1E.32827%rmohanr@cisco.com> <A634ECAF-9D68-41B7-85C6-F521F5BC821B@MRS> <006d01d09e5a$b0410200$10c30600$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/D-ipH2j2a4_KpiiTZsXUQnsTSvY>
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Updated PERC Charter proposal
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:12:41 -0000

On 3 Jun 2015, at 19:09, Parthasarathi R wrote:

> I also agree to consider the requirement to see how SIPREC & PERC will
> work together as it is important for Enterprise usecases.

(Trying to separate this out from the mechanism discussion over the last 
couple of days...)

Is the charter text about coordinating with SIPREC insufficient for this 
purpose?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email