IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Updated PERC Charter proposal

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 02 June 2015 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50061AC406 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRDfQMM77-oI for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963E91AC3D2 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wikd7 with SMTP id d7so19339938wik.0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jl0+Zp/j5zRCf6NIkYFV0+kmtFdq0OqBrcxOVMufheE=; b=C0ievnsz0gNQyhsoZG3O5cDIH1EZZtwWiad0C2mwO2+UvBfgHQI11hOrRzfNgnb9Zh VMb2DMr1T12Y8MG7g6aoV11L4+dRqi5Y6NTNPBppUM1QbPv14PI4kPz0rFCmx8S3E7Pm UXoZZyrow4rIVag5qS977Yg9BBJwws+cDjcYIKUgz57B4+GttyH/tdwE5mCrF2oqATc+ vRyfAd4O3M1Wh7g2UO/v0aCOApOZcSeCIAA6Z7HCsUazKGWBF+j9UOH3jD+C/68JhBtY uDZaPAplhv7lZF2r4RAuJhcHARqKLzawtAvwkm5UMW8QNOSWQJtWD04tTH8LoGpq0bmm SXtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3cfO4lhY2/McTB5vcd0Ic2fiuSle0rJhksmTG2AHDhGtB/T4iLR60COJa+Hj21Q4F0c4E
X-Received: by 10.194.59.79 with SMTP id x15mr35510021wjq.81.1433263266362; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.225.14 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <556DDC0C.3010107@andyet.net>
References: <CAHBDyN6BeyL-wh_=t7jN+tfhTTnZK0uTBra-F7MR11x9eFkGpg@mail.gmail.com> <D188F24E.14D48%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com> <55683230.3020600@ericsson.com> <CAHBDyN68U=KiyM8aTzbmmFzN9cZJ_MgZs00VPCODyufMn=JpUA@mail.gmail.com> <556C2A44.8010805@ericsson.com> <D193CBFB.32759%rmohanr@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMGUG0A8ypCz2kF8hqfsKemXK4CX8ujLFOi2HjGWunJ9g@mail.gmail.com> <556DDC0C.3010107@andyet.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:40:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPtc-Wp=4WSc_NXCZM+SSY6o0eFDbnPE+zCLTB_LY7PvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b8737aedc89e705178b9bc7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/r5_j0NXZmt_CbwNSzi2Pntib7OE>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, Yaron Pdut <Yaron.Pdut@nice.com>, "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Updated PERC Charter proposal
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:41:09 -0000

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
wrote:

> On 6/2/15 10:21 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>  The way you record PERC sessions is by bringing them into the call at
>> the signaling level. There's no PERC-level accommodation needed.
>>
>
> Who is "them"? Do you mean "recording resources" of some kind would be
> added as participants to the call? Just trying to clarify the model...


Yes.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email