Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 29 April 2022 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BEAC15ED4A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=LPF4jSBE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=qTe7ztX/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AeB4E5RLimUt for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A49C15EE36 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4407FF8016D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:11:00 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1651245060; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=Kgcf92O+30BmTWrjSWzjIrbXB1u5J3zunRI+9ls6N3M=; b=LPF4jSBE3n27cHLSHgp27u7mrcVjRRcY3cE10HoIwvKZ7kaRdqgXHL3e0pzMwHw0MzV9M 8wlCb32sp27YuNfAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1651245060; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=Kgcf92O+30BmTWrjSWzjIrbXB1u5J3zunRI+9ls6N3M=; b=qTe7ztX/Osbahq3HyRsOn4/kFyTM1k/KoXTG0teaclCx+Qik76eF+AWuNc5lNfmNM4/1W bXKvfeNwd7s+9+etqSvzQOLFqs7puXRGtoy6ggPEx0SMbis2uLlo1lCh4HsBxSeuTTfuB1x jwAdL6k2MhFVgkLN0G9exfVhcy0CxsnZEFJpXP6e8wGSgSvXlrLEvTTSp1JDwWADt4DeBRL ONfUyAcRhUb8wocc/KhhjEqoxa9FNShlKsCzmCJYbdfkw6Jff+Xx9j6eunjmBgEtsD53dGR OHNPbtoe+Q8jLSsWUNo2y+cARuqfD8CzMVHov+dgjTdEDMw6nLWAyrtfzl2g==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F685F8016A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:11:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:10:59 -0400
Message-ID: <43455779.Q0NcroJU1p@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <CAKFywTKyjWy_=YY-2LPzE4y1aY+AsbQ1W2ovvk7Us++1Bwutgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <164925666278.4445.13789431014958416691@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFywTKyjWy_=YY-2LPzE4y1aY+AsbQ1W2ovvk7Us++1Bwutgg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/F3Vuf2Zla-ngJ6JkbJoH5J3eljE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:11:40 -0000

On Friday, April 29, 2022 3:29:33 AM EDT Robert wrote:
> A couple of little issues in the ABNF of the formal definition section 5.4:
> 
>      dmarc-psd       = "psd" *WSP "=" ( "y" / "n" )
> Should be:
>      dmarc-psd       = "psd" *WSP "=" *WSP ( "y" / "n" / "u" )
> 
> and
>      dmarc-test      = "t" *WSP "=" ( "y" / "n" )
> should be:
>      dmarc-test      = "t" *WSP "=" *WSP ( "y" / "n" )
> 
> Also I've noticed that the dmarc-uri definition seems to be missing
> the stuff about the file size limitation? At the moment it's just:
>      dmarc-uri       = URI
>                        ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; commas (ASCII
>                        ; 0x2C) and exclamation points (ASCII 0x21)
>                        ; MUST be encoded
> not sure what it should be.

I'm not any kind of an ABNF expert, but adding the missing "u" for dmarc-psd 
is definitely correct and I believe the *WSP for dmarc-psd and dmarc-test are 
correct also.

I would suggest those go into the next revision.  Any suggestions on the 
dmarc-uri question?

Scott K