IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 19 April 2022 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471683A03EF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=IfEm9DaG; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=GcylVXkg
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWwVsp1Kq3_s for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419B53A03F9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 40203 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2022 21:17:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=9d09.625f26fe.k2204; bh=haGCnEm7hROVSbC/OfmLty1Gz1Z/GddDCdQSkgUevOA=; b=IfEm9DaGAhx9IvUa8c0X8OPrtNv7V/lyoSQdayRGT/TuGKmFbsYvfkp7qL22Q6GQFvxS5Ju7kgp6xAwXMq9dqNmPdTKnMHJIrGk4gLKs+W/6moE1wtwfeNWPvRx0YzWMfo4G9WIWCs3wA7kcp2AtfuEVg5CRwCzBod1lRzcBqkdW8p7ZHpL2vhzoEOUbHC9BwxQsEjmutaU/081GW381JOAgKf7RQjr7ByK2XM5iWjktVW2se34GcBekPtAxxZMzIopv0qBjMbKjzD5xIUvXT0qf/1dF42EalJ9Das7j54DRoLiXE6HSWptV8IU7WAIoNwCGfZrx4TtFrUukI8REOw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=9d09.625f26fe.k2204; bh=haGCnEm7hROVSbC/OfmLty1Gz1Z/GddDCdQSkgUevOA=; b=GcylVXkgbpwduWgGQPXejBKZJPPlmQW30WyL79+DcpvDUCoLGjuSZ5OfjHAXCABRTyi4Qp/p2J2BMUpVEp+uEv1+GD4ScHWilnZuVGCyRpBlmi8vHDQffs+WyfKlS5rtaW0Yta3WmIErD5vSYdzKoula5fdKDauEXww4NUn1T8OpgNRAKbVhsHjGWTYDqvDD7ZOeI8pnnFLAaCop1khoyUXv23KiZGAgCgMtJ3XFKsmZaIZYRPnmNKu1N9PM3C5ogiqIIaGySPTgcrCm/cIqrdEUDlG6KdUwTjjmNgt2xKuzzVCT6X4pDmygtnIyhnu5CPq+NosdFGFOz3mGlAJL8w==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 19 Apr 2022 21:17:50 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id AAE543E229C7; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:17:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:17:49 -0400
Message-Id: <20220419211749.AAE543E229C7@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: sklist@kitterman.com
In-Reply-To: <2148122.ImoBPBQZ76@zini-1880>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/H33ts9veosx3eZunqzMMUEKbeVc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 21:17:58 -0000

It appears that Scott Kitterman  <sklist@kitterman.com> said:
>> What PSL entries that are 5 long are you worried about?  When we looked at
>> this before, 5 seemed sufficient.  Changing the number, now, isn't a big
>> deal.
>
>OK, I checked.  Here's the list:

I also recently went through the PSL looking for DMARC records and I agree with Scott,
nothing longer than 5 is likely to be used for mail.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email