IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

Robert <aradesh@gmail.com> Fri, 29 April 2022 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <aradesh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78413C15948E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYaKQ0TfeEjh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE07C157B5B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id be20so8040117edb.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FVJvm+50wkIA2pnS4uBcy2iznyBPzQF0acrEMaRTDEk=; b=U/Fur/g+WlswSgmZUwpWbOKDPGYdDHTx1M0i18yHFx4QPqp4BPFLAOWTvobjYN9UJ0 R2JEsqQm7TwLFxxrBq8d9AnXBnJpHcOlYN1aWKdyLEKtNpltwV45HSy/A1lzm6MXUsgb KG+yNDhpMHbQlOMaM2SQSDZqBb7GXzSGqL4uY1yVpTGC+lCdF6BkON5YFBHs5TJTEj93 R4izAN9+rwQb4ZNMNvFjtYHlgZsd1z6K8c/f/gBwSY5w8gjlmvoOr9QVikI3WSyIt9QT hliP3PeZN3GHfq83jKJRXjRaSVPLAXE6u3do5Dsv/2QR5E3pdWPqxRawWtWDw/ZkW1NL Ixow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=FVJvm+50wkIA2pnS4uBcy2iznyBPzQF0acrEMaRTDEk=; b=Md3Ap0A9ZClX+V/jcS3ZXaMdCzLXuhpBbvlLwqjV/U0vcsr/27rNPXnX558DNFItvY fCXDd6GcHC4jr2lbtfUUejr8Sl3n/ID+fXhz2vAASO80lI7ojfs6LAoMtJ4WC5q1mdWZ 0k6N/bYq8gcw8K1Nm340gGuc5npzKdrDWy7kBOUu+5pyETRn5/veb1shXXVpk5OwWdvI xhg/+AxR9E+kaVS6JYYEq/3mKEfcdhcoyhjRnDiiB7fMns9VQSv9qgRMlcqeKY3/cnCG emcGaAuY3FzDGtkPTNZqF8jwakaJZhrbyFKc+8uBl0oBKprsgvRMcRGhgQ6ikYsVRUn5 9SCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SZmuG7idnOs49d4YVU80bC/ZgQODg9VrJo4ncJ600IuHd2iwc PXDIt8iLHE/Zilp215iiu0a5gfZrm/NTPsWWqgdeiQj3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyRuREegmKkJNb56J61l0ujET8cvVQVuqW0u/P26jyK6LgzZ/HfTElduOWfgrAxcDouAaWshVBnSyGp281fAI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4303:b0:426:2fbc:c76e with SMTP id m3-20020a056402430300b004262fbcc76emr5338759edc.324.1651217374328; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6f02:381:b0:1a:7a4f:5762 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <164925666278.4445.13789431014958416691@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <164925666278.4445.13789431014958416691@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Robert <aradesh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:29:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKFywTKyjWy_=YY-2LPzE4y1aY+AsbQ1W2ovvk7Us++1Bwutgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xjqd-sBX8e45SZFVCxlrVYfoKBM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:29:36 -0000

A couple of little issues in the ABNF of the formal definition section 5.4:

     dmarc-psd       = "psd" *WSP "=" ( "y" / "n" )
Should be:
     dmarc-psd       = "psd" *WSP "=" *WSP ( "y" / "n" / "u" )

and
     dmarc-test      = "t" *WSP "=" ( "y" / "n" )
should be:
     dmarc-test      = "t" *WSP "=" *WSP ( "y" / "n" )

Also I've noticed that the dmarc-uri definition seems to be missing
the stuff about the file size limitation? At the moment it's just:
     dmarc-uri       = URI
                       ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; commas (ASCII
                       ; 0x2C) and exclamation points (ASCII 0x21)
                       ; MUST be encoded
not sure what it should be.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email