Re: [dnsext] Some thoughts on the updated aliasing draft

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 30 March 2011 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433263A69AE for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xWqfwIIFkTrh for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A63A6B70 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10887 invoked by uid 399); 30 Mar 2011 23:32:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?65.241.43.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@65.241.43.5) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 30 Mar 2011 23:32:31 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 65.241.43.5
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4D93BD8D.9040009@dougbarton.us>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:32:29 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
References: <AANLkTimOKdFt9PyRD_hEdQstyak9Z-eCOAHm3FYooMjL@mail.gmail.com> <8239m6z1x9.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103291253470.3124@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103291253470.3124@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Some thoughts on the updated aliasing draft
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:30:59 -0000

If I may do so without seeming immodest, I believe that the CLONE draft 
adequately addresses all of the concerns raised in this thread so far. I 
haven't had any feedback on the -01 version yet, so hopefully this is an 
opportune time for a gentle prod (because I know that those of you in 
Prague don't have enough to do already). :)


Doug


http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barton-clone-dns-labels-fun-profit-01

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/