Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 09 March 2011 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F3E3A6A87 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:12:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id efxc54-uVrtq for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2383A6A6E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4100 invoked by uid 399); 9 Mar 2011 20:13:59 -0000
Received: from router.ka9q.net (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@75.60.237.91) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 9 Mar 2011 20:13:59 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 75.60.237.91
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4D77DF86.8010001@dougbarton.us>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:13:58 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110304 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
References: <EE8A5F5A-26CD-474A-B983-32948A06DEBD@icann.org> <4D77D2AF.7010203@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <4D77D6D8.9070609@dougbarton.us> <4D77DE1F.5080803@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D77DE1F.5080803@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:12:46 -0000

On 03/09/2011 12:07, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> I'm relieved to learn my observations were unnecessary

Glad I could help. :)


-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/