IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Wed, 09 March 2011 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <miekg@atoom.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC8A3A6A46 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:53:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pUxy2xkNhIk for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EBD3A680F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99AC23FF63; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:54:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:54:13 +0100
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110309185413.GA1045@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <C99C3502.72B1%roy@nominet.org.uk> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103082030190.5244@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <72A22513B1644CFE9023189F93BFDD32@local> <20110309080006.GA23957@miek.nl> <758260B7B5B34599BA80D9BA5A3840C0@local> <20110309090536.GA9578@miek.nl> <4D77CB55.40407@ogud.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D77CB55.40407@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:53:00 -0000

[ Quoting �lafur Gu�mundsson in "Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Co"... ]
> >Is this proposal aimed at TLDs or at smaller zones? Because for .nl we
> >are just going to use EPP and let the registrar send in a DNSKEY which
> >we will convert to a DS (so you can not even choose your own hash
> >algo).
> >
> 
> DNS >> TLD's  and even in among your registrars when do you expect
> the last one to support DNSSEC updating of DS records?

That state will probably never be reached.

But I agree: "new types are cheap"

grtz,

--
 Miek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email