Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes
John C Klensin <john@jck.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 18:22 UTC
Return-Path: <john@jck.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513E512896F; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbBqrpsxPtGW; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa3.jck.com (static-65-175-133-137.cpe.metrocast.net [65.175.133.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2BB13270A; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hp5.int.jck.com ([198.252.137.153] helo=JcK-HP5.jck.com) by bsa3.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john@jck.com>) id 1dSSSC-000622-Vs; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 14:21:40 -0400
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 14:21:35 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7DCA3DAF1993A2E66915D0DD@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com> <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com> <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com> <5F120298-CD66-4CB6-9DC5-0C5DF6F02CC7@fugue.com> <CACfw2hhx+-Z=7ZnnaOkToc+Bd7aKDpBFt+nFUxkt9sKqLn4D8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2DF1AFC7-643B-4610-8EB8-0616D3D0B024@fugue.com> <595BD53E.60701@redbarn.org> <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1vsfdJlPIg6BLBIXTfG7Ov8jQpE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:22:00 -0000
--On Tuesday, July 04, 2017 6:53 PM +0100 Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote: >> On 4 Jul 2017, at 18:49, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote: >> >> while IETF governs the protocol, ICANN only governs the IN >> class. i expect that there will be other classes some day, in >> order to avoid some aspect of ICANN. > > Attempts have already been made to do just that. It would be > nice not to have to put out those fires all over again. Jim, Paul, First of all, if only because "QCLASS=ANY" is supposed to do something sensible, one really cannot have different, per-Class, roots (more of that argument and the difficulties for many of the things people have wanted to use CLASSes for in recent years appears in draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless). While I don't believe "useless", I don't see any hope for using the CLASS mechanism to "avoid ... ICANN". More important, given historical difficulties with adoption and broad deployment of new features, I suggest that anyone who sees ICANN avoidance as am important goal would find establishing an alternate root and building support for it far easily and more plausible than anything that could be done with CLASSes, if only because an ICANN-free class mechanism would, AFAICT, require a root (even for Class=IN) that was not controlled by ICANN anyway. Having enough of the world get aggravated enough at ICANN (or some other entity of one's choice) to make general adoption of an alternate root plausible is another matter and I don't think we are there, at least yet. The level of confusion and global inconsistencies that would accompany any transition to a different root and root management structure would be bad enough that I hope the day at which that aggravation threshold is reached does not come even if, ICANN seems to be trying some days. Those who are contemplating that sort of adventure might find at least parts of draft-klensin-dns-function-considerations amusing reading. In particular, Section 3.6 briefly addresses the topic of different CLASSes as a mechanism for doing new and different things (technical or administrative). best, john
- [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnso… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Paul Vixie
- [DNSOP] new DNS classes Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Warren Kumari
- [DNSOP] draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless (was Re:… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes shogunx
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Martin Rex
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Andrew Sullivan