Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray convergence
tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 02:44 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C6A130DD3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:44:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bVZ87vwuYKAe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D3E130ED4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d13-v6so1439430pfo.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:44:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=d1gZtYpiK63EL8CpeJmfO74V+Z36MuIjoKNPMkEqBNE=; b=oL6PU/t3Z5BKQ5fN4ETcdya3CUkdshl2i3D9zGuBCE55hg+dPKDa5erT0gVHHueZZU 2E4BzrFCkXEYliyzXIUKiVOek7xMdcu9X216LFZxgbEAGSxhaZyVdR4S8I+yBNeVvJlT iwBedHUkS18qY3HXawimwt++6hFVan4U0TintgJpbHvNq1/CTCYKq4YwvDpQRfYCQisC Wt37WnxSaD8dQdInYT9Lcg2iNLdXU14mKBmx7nuXG5cuHOT0F9OU5mK0Gk74jJO+R0AS EbET9iA2DBGZfWJs+FKVTaOpeCXTo1sGX4xd3M8s8ihpJACsbVlDOr5a7tC98hrXZgCj 5OZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=d1gZtYpiK63EL8CpeJmfO74V+Z36MuIjoKNPMkEqBNE=; b=dQGiXivqyVF1Giw5sntCI1QlO+48OUmOVZISqLAdm3nXM5DXmvGP1+Zvpvg1+IZZNA vRtgSDpXee2yC9duWidRIb+QyfYVvlz6jnWLlje4cQQElX85iFkpDnQmeulSe4UG1cWZ qrf4apGaldS+HhrMHVnCoRRKPJC6LXtq72osutWEgOEeMad3jq08Kw5QqlNzVHwVWkZZ fa65vXn4Ed2HdpNtkwLTFyumGP2AB2ev8R7AompSb/8fqxLMOV/9VwC/E620JhEhpsZ0 o+oO56R+Uh3g/bMARHSiDCiuMkXrfEO/FfBLO7tsI6daMGWBixtDOJpDm33NawrVzAr3 4ctg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIclmblCpzJHUiA1I8/Ub9Z/ER1yF0j3WD8CweS3HOLyj5oascZ O9dY0bJChbZ7E9OcQQmdr2eI8W+rwTc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eTleYWHDCFShbJIawB2sm/2HsVj5mtso/Wpzef3oWxrJTGnd5PYMsJkcYKmhMy6rAIEnhxmQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:c508:: with SMTP id f8-v6mr2381428pgd.412.1541645050690; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.248.8] ([38.98.37.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 196-v6sm5772170pfc.71.2018.11.07.18.44.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16A404)
In-Reply-To: <c9bac765-667f-5ad2-6da3-3d2e5aa59212@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:44:00 +0900
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CCDC1181-E62D-4CB4-8096-474C7BC02366@gmail.com>
References: <CAH1iCirXYsYB3sAo8f1Jy-q4meLmQAPSFO-7x5idDufdT_unXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+nkc8C6yVT62cW5QP-ec2ZT7FY_n48Ecr=CLeE6FS_1duBO8g@mail.gmail.com> <bccfabab-6fab-867e-7c12-8ced9f0d11b6@oracle.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811061537410.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <793c448e-8eaf-a227-0875-7562a52e8a6e@bellis.me.uk> <b285b18c-8805-491e-5f3d-22f0c79e4f57@oracle.com> <CADyWQ+Eh1Tqr=wXpj4umzp6c5rSmNs7RGg+8w8X=On8UnKGKfg@mail.gmail.com> <c9bac765-667f-5ad2-6da3-3d2e5aa59212@bellis.me.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4CL_N57K_UvwhAcCn9pQtV1kJqY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray convergence
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 02:44:15 -0000
From my high tech gadget > On Nov 8, 2018, at 06:30, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote: > >> On 08/11/2018 04:13, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> >> I can't stress this enough - when you see ALIAS records at zone cuts >> that point to a database server, already, then we've missed the >> "server specific" ball. > > This sounds like it ought to be a very unusual configuration. > > Even with a zone cut, couldn't those DB servers have been addressed as 'db.<domain>' instead? Sure but as more than one engineer whose been using this for several years asks “why should I change? This works now and you’re just cramping engineering velocity. “ And saying “it’s not standard” doesn’t hold water. Sure there are migration issues but if folks stay in their vendor ecosystem.... These are the questions we as operators are asked regularly. These are the questions DNSOP need to look forward on. > >> And can someone show a significant number of SRV examples outside of >> SIP and some gaming servers? > > Kerberos and AD both use SRV records. Bonjour uses SRV extensively. I forgot about AD. Those are set up by admins right? Doesn’t Bonjour create those records behind the scenes? People are saying a domain owner is going to log into godaddy and configure a SRV record. If you want to convince me SRV will work get the vendors to support it seamlessly. > Either way, SRV is only one of three different ways that services are differentiated (per 5507). > > Ray > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Erik Nygren
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Christian Huitema
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Ebersman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Ebersman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- [DNSOP] CNAME at apex - a website publisher persp… Dan York
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems manu tman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Ebersman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Olli Vanhoja
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Thomas Peterson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Dan York
- [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray converg… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Michael J. Sheldon
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… tjw ietf
- Re: [DNSOP] Further ANAME minimization /\ Ray con… Kevin Darcy
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Thomas Peterson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Tim Wicinski