IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sat, 09 May 2015 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C491ACD2D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2015 06:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i2RPMPGIPhDq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2015 06:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5E81ACD28 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2015 06:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so58327404wid.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 May 2015 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KoCHUDSI26GV2h5+8ndXcJ6ot7OtCpcJM/1npolcAs=; b=kQBTFCmlA1lRnus6UUe0T5S5q+VBwTxAcvAXINAfnVQGThGA6Wl4O81J2aQj134N+f mCFfofScsdFRPxZRUx7hRDYlKx7Tv1EACH5Rxp8U8nmMOYBK8c1gZ/F62ubsRB76unJu fjt9PBzl9MfN7bf5sQ6N6/yp9FpB1K6t1cMLpqRopFLaYXNkeucu0Y8EFMVwehVk6M5B 1eCIleJCFnmUlaxE0DbrU8qJZSEGNl4A5piYmksMiTtbJBVkLMfOft372jpj7YUSzJYM YybQyT2vdm3vHN3dx2kV+M68/cp2Q7vlpAGoRP2DmjE/lmvyaWyrBD3s08BnhEVb1W7w Q4gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkrsKmVjD1XpPBFtzPxpN11KrIN9aAQR51Q+6aurMb4mHd+BFGqsSp0sFMcaSkapgtvROcw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.83.130 with SMTP id q2mr4774500wiy.89.1431176887053; Sat, 09 May 2015 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.47.36 with HTTP; Sat, 9 May 2015 06:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <621331AE-3D8F-4442-A0BA-756986AAA693@isoc.org>
References: <553EBF02.3050703@gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKdcttLJt2-BjVdAyEq=Bxx_i9pwTO+Z_UJfMVCk58Wnw@mail.gmail.com> <621331AE-3D8F-4442-A0BA-756986AAA693@isoc.org>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 15:08:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLOAUscu4My-PpYcEhjk=5OhfWM_1opwLREXMj_4PK6TA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/C8W8E_q019QzrolzQdN5T_Tt_YQ>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 13:08:14 -0000

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:
> Warren and Tim,
>
> I support the publishing of this document subject to incorporating the
> various comments I’ve seen here on that list. I had a couple of specific
> points but they seem to have been covered by others,  so…
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>  I really appreciate all feedback, and will integrate comments in the next
> couple of days (I like to rev the doc even during WGLC, so that everyone can
> see the most recent state, and not comment on older comments, etc
>
>
> … I’ll wait for your next version before making any specific comments on the
> text.  With all the comments coming in I’ve lost track of all the suggested
> changes.

Yah, fair enough. This is why I like to integrate comments and post
new versions, even during WGLC -- but, I got somewhat behind.... New
version posted, with (I *think*) all comments integrated / resolved.

W

>
> Dan
>
> --
> Dan York
> Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society
> york@isoc.org   +1-802-735-1624
> Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org
> Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/
>
>
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email