Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2897132632 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a3g9dD3XqNYz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF272132622 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 16so173576591qkg.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4qn8CsmUp3VsJv1LXuhDtWSBYCrAZ0i8c5lergRSQ8U=; b=CBoJg9y19WxiAtNSE10Gsan7axBKZTvGcLOf3MBk7LTxERKUxZS5bWiBfLSrCmehcb bWXnCgtKXVzTIdOBU2C79Nwf3/M7mC5muEkig1NA2ezyS1b+etatndPDQPEy78pG0AcH mYZ6ZES8Zploe+AmU4n6xxbEZMWXbrWutpmpCADojNZXFyewXYmZB33BRsu0SxWhJI13 tW97fvSZTJ1/v2NjOcx86eQ9NtxWQofeNBwul3Sn5/qTJRbrpB5Wb2nFGjkf5nC3bEG6 rTYb1XukEQYN6z2/B/1O+smtnIkcpnxlh04HPIlyFUncNf7Q22Yih4qCRLJdhPamM1XI EBgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4qn8CsmUp3VsJv1LXuhDtWSBYCrAZ0i8c5lergRSQ8U=; b=EoD5Oh5Xhj09yw2BwyFnFMkKWmO6cFAkmZusBG6ikYqEKhlb4ThViWEDjcdyyQA1Hb fzptlAywEbW9SpQmfxN8ue0SO6XcrSKXgESMuxMJazHQ2dX1eRCsV2TCiexRqaFWIJWK E/eYGeLT7fRwV9SQZXhH5fhA30LeyJmCI75dYJ/RUBq6yaSLakXdxqOgFqkuLs1yjZ5Q nNfobzoYJcTJkYRfQy3tY12uLmUlN0trRVMBgCOQuuI+FAoS1u4swtrij0kz1EG84JC3 QowmlFG0N7l0Kj7joua6VQ4f1vLnBCpqsK26qZ5QGyeFockPZpRxLMKsvSZn+oHTseL3 +clA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1121wzF0hCAEbkNwA00+BzrVYCilAdjIdv0+OeQKSTMBZ/8UGS5N qPS5xFCodzkCrZO3
X-Received: by 10.55.145.6 with SMTP id t6mr17575675qkd.101.1499191111009; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.114] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o23sm15406937qko.67.2017.07.04.10.58.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15A5304i)
In-Reply-To: <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:58:29 -0400
Cc: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E91DDA9-EFF5-4682-972D-95491A3DC22B@fugue.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com> <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com> <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com> <5F120298-CD66-4CB6-9DC5-0C5DF6F02CC7@fugue.com> <CACfw2hhx+-Z=7ZnnaOkToc+Bd7aKDpBFt+nFUxkt9sKqLn4D8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2DF1AFC7-643B-4610-8EB8-0616D3D0B024@fugue.com> <595BD53E.60701@redbarn.org> <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OfHn-dhY941x9xNYPyZZnbsLoi4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:58:40 -0000

On Jul 4, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>; wrote:
> Attempts have already been made to do just that. It would be nice not to have to put out those fires all over again.

Realistically, at some point the damage the ICANN process has done will have to get fixed, just like the damage the itu did got sort of fixed.  Like that case, the results will be messy. But we’ll all be gone by then, I suspect.