Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Thu, 30 March 2017 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4F6126B72 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUHIubrmiy61 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8F41292FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p77so29297000ywg.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CzkFbZZsRrOnK4gcFVajpLTEAt06i3VWUKLCZKxfzu8=; b=OkKHjaEUNBmi2vpMPZQq9bJIG5dlDrMiO+TZFpKIzRFsqi0bVobrcbWk8JFDztTJ1i o5WgGuM/p5hVLP3utmgEaSkKgiVfnDnrZN4UHmsIX7P9qcrFWqIBZij0MiCDLlOOZVz+ 3ULXMBvpSYdHNwRn9SDkOqAdb+g6ro+EHlD4R1PMwRH63Hdlo6TQjUhw/nXzJS3W0n3Z uImuSi8DEMkC7SQiartDPMIErSBRIZNs+9b46hsJk317YD0oWYDKduREST6Q0KgAjv12 MHHY9YEwj96Hfgzq9DdkDmzwtvKIIzIJW42QwBFz9Dw05fDDboSMltNRBbtx/2TfIG5w NAiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CzkFbZZsRrOnK4gcFVajpLTEAt06i3VWUKLCZKxfzu8=; b=NEptzssK59SvAktW1wB93bREs4Y3KwQcET/6DOWhtplt1Rv7xPd51+945S4ftL7vpf x6hi5Xsp/5oQfFjnXtwUCFSGqb7Z6P26anISXDlle0j3pOo1cWCYymDB/U1KXFK7oiEs 5edJaXfeDd74oSobV1RZTaNWm35tnko3PQCPwkjZ/9oBn8kRh2XIhR/4sclyw2X/PZXC dP3mfQhYCSuls6gS2DTAuicH/hsW5cphciF9FT1ISIv9J5AtVzjtSd96tFXvzcwR4f1y 5oEg68MYQMHMpVYCNlRuhrjkdvAhniHe5KzaZtav6s40reQoaxx2+XxC7xd2ww0dNuLr uaQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0DrdWG/WB+ekR48FuhWMWtionY6kRuLwZPEURtWgFDGZ3RA5sUiidH0sSiH/ohR3tQOdEcRS1SfQxLr9Mb
X-Received: by 10.129.132.73 with SMTP id u70mr1146863ywf.231.1490902876934; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.109.134 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1703291154090.13590@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20170328183156.2467.qmail@ary.lan> <20170328205151.GB23312@isc.org> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD0717CFC@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <20170329021935.GA25314@isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703282245500.4804@ary.local> <20170329040341.GA27262@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1703291154090.13590@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:41:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8ADxUMuaNyhQrhqHvTN5nn9R363eKNLGiXH_njz6es+=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07ade460049d054bf7e0e1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_n9jw6pWVxBkZnUE7bHMV9KJjtw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:41:20 -0000

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

> Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
> >
> > At least, please add some operational advice that BULK is not to be
> > deployed in any domain unless all auth servers for that domain fully
> > implement it.
>
> Yes.
>
> This is fairly similar to the requirement for DNSSEC support on auth
> servers, and there wasn't any explicit signalling in the xfer protocol
> in that case.
>
> Tony.
>

I agree that those choosing to use BULK would need to choose their
secondaries accordingly, similar to DNSSEC, or live with the effects of
inconsistency.

-- 
Bob Harold