Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Thu, 30 March 2017 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7A3129A23 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9lR5gP8162C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6361296BB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7130349412; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:49:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id CE322216C1C; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:49:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:49:14 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
Cc: 'John R Levine' <johnl@taugh.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170330184914.GB58639@isc.org>
References: <20170328183156.2467.qmail@ary.lan> <20170328205151.GB23312@isc.org> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD0717CFC@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <20170329021935.GA25314@isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703282245500.4804@ary.local> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD071C1E3@PDDCWMBXEX507.ctl.intranet> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703290833160.5140@ary.local> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD07336F0@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD07336F0@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ukr38R0zYFx9vX9c77SpW_I4anw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:49:30 -0000

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:25:28PM +0000, Woodworth, John R wrote:
> I was under the impression DNSSEC fixed problems with integrity,
> not inconsistency.

There's an expectation that the DNS will only be loosely coherent, but the
same serial number should have the same answers, and an NSEC/NSEC3 proving
nonexistence of an answer at one auth server is going be problematic if
there is a positive answer from another.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.