Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> Fri, 14 March 2008 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4D28C0E5; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.254, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myRh3RNZHsmX; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D5428C170; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABDF28C189 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luTFmMe4wCHx for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirrus.av8.net (cirrus.av8.net [130.105.36.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6365D3A687F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from citation2.av8.net (citation2.av8.net [130.105.12.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by cirrus.av8.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2EMppbg000938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:51:51 -0400
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:51:50 -0400
From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
X-X-Sender: dean@citation2.av8.net
To: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <20080314034500.GE7553@x27.adm.denic.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0803141843290.17638-100000@citation2.av8.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

I oppose this document. I won't go into details since none of my
objections have ever been addressed, other than to say "We addressed
your objection" with a frivolous change or no change at all. Reposting
the details seems an utter waste of time.

If this document is eventually approved by the WG, I will file a
detailed objection with the IESG.  I see no point in further detailed
discussion until that event transpires, except to note that I remain
opposed.  I don't expect my opposition to change unless the previously
noted problems are addressed, and so far, they've either been ignored or
frivolously handled.  I believe the objections of others have also been
ignored or frivolously handled.

Thanks,

		--Dean

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Peter Koch wrote:

> Dear WG,
> 
> in accordance with the roadmap posted the other day, this is to initiate
> a working group last call on
> 
> 	"Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
> 	draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06.txt
> 
> ending Friday, 2008-04-04, 18:00 UTC.
> 
> The document is aimed at a status of "BCP".
> Please review the draft and send comments and/or statements of support orFrom dnsop-bounces@ietf.org  Fri Mar 14 15:54:16 2008
Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4D28C0E5;
	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.691
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=-0.254, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451,
	HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id myRh3RNZHsmX; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D5428C170;
	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABDF28C189
	for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id luTFmMe4wCHx for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>;
	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirrus.av8.net (cirrus.av8.net [130.105.36.66])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6365D3A687F
	for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from citation2.av8.net (citation2.av8.net [130.105.12.10])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by cirrus.av8.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2EMppbg000938
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:51:51 -0400
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:51:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
X-X-Sender: dean@citation2.av8.net
To: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <20080314034500.GE7553@x27.adm.denic.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0803141843290.17638-100000@citation2.av8.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse
	Mapping"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
	<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
	<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

I oppose this document. I won't go into details since none of my
objections have ever been addressed, other than to say "We addressed
your objection" with a frivolous change or no change at all. Reposting
the details seems an utter waste of time.

If this document is eventually approved by the WG, I will file a
detailed objection with the IESG.  I see no point in further detailed
discussion until that event transpires, except to note that I remain
opposed.  I don't expect my opposition to change unless the previously
noted problems are addressed, and so far, they've either been ignored or
frivolously handled.  I believe the objections of others have also been
ignored or frivolously handled.

Thanks,

		--Dean

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Peter Koch wrote:

> Dear WG,
> 
> in accordance with the roadmap posted the other day, this is to initiate
> a working group last call on
> 
> 	"Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
> 	draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06.txt
> 
> ending Friday, 2008-04-04, 18:00 UTC.
> 
> The document is aimed at a status of "BCP".
> Please review the draft and send comments and/or statements of support or
> non-support to the WG mailing list.  We have taken names of volunteers,
> but everyone is encouraged to review.  There will be a five reviewer threshold
> and _no_ default action.
> 
> -Peter [co-chair hat on]
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000   


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



> non-support to the WG mailing list.  We have taken names of volunteers,
> but everyone is encouraged to review.  There will be a five reviewer threshold
> and _no_ default action.
> 
> -Peter [co-chair hat on]
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000   


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop