IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

Andras Salamon <andras@dns.net> Wed, 26 March 2008 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F3328C83A; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCTmWgBP+1Qh; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2215528C5D1; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5350A3A6F75 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDXm4dfPfPM7 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.dns.net (server1.dns.net [64.39.31.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B08A3A6CC6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by server1.dns.net (8.11.7/8.11.6) id m2QNnmr32467; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:49:48 GMT
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:49:32 +0000
From: Andras Salamon <andras@dns.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20080326234932.GA23189@dns.net>
References: <20080314034500.GE7553@x27.adm.denic.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080314034500.GE7553@x27.adm.denic.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 04:45:00AM +0100, Peter Koch wrote:
> 	"Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
> 	draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06.txt

I have reviewed the document and believe it presents the current
network situation in a balanced way.  Its suggestions allow for a
variety of different administrative policies, while still arguing that
the benefits of maintaining reverse mappings in most cases outweigh
the costs.

Personally I would have preferred additional citations, for instance
to support many of the statements in 3.1, but I support the document
progressing as is.

-- Andras Salamon                   andras@dns.net
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email