Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 02 April 2008 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16EC3A68BD; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1313A6AC1 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dag+eluMrQNQ for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB5B3A6828 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([81.200.64.181]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:10:23 PDT
Received: from mail.nominum.com (mail.nominum.com [81.200.64.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB3856876; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:10:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from lam.fugue.com ([66.93.162.226]) (authenticated user mellon@nominum.com) by mail.nominum.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:10:21 -0700
Message-Id: <9D9B6A12-B53D-4ED2-BDEF-D11A69A5E1DA@nominum.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080401213559.GA38207@commandprompt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v922.1)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:10:14 -0700
References: <200803312055.m2VKtQvt039221@drugs.dv.isc.org> <a06240801c417f486db4d@[192.168.1.100]> <20080401213559.GA38207@commandprompt.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.922.1)
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> I'm inclined to add this text.  I'd like additional expressions of
> support (or edits, or whatever) from the WG to confirm my inclination.

I agree that it's worth mentioning.


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop