Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 23:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515E3120241 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMXG-g2jBVYR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459CE12022E for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id b3so728631otp.4 for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YrZkSpIQlKCEbTRZq6CBuo0SdXjDimjtuX5xvL3YsIY=; b=rlfLQi5J3PvkAOwPsD6P5zJ0BUcCwYOykmJN5X03UvJhy0P+76Ym0zz43CdiWGycQO cOIm4kbKiu6TohXHvQkL2cuCD3LQntxm6eP4WApqHUibAIuuEYP1FTzH5wByDW++ui8/ mO78dFVujzGQvY9GEAbPRwDxbSfRCLBHaa0cn3QovOK2yaGbqLWD4XdrXIEb5EAL1fz7 9dp9kocUvv14U7GiLkOWi93kgPqKqJTN3dNdkjmd5VDIWFY9jlFfo56uirDnRA/dLRjt WrTx3Ulw+HHki/+GNv9s9pPZS9mx9aAzBFgheD1bek6kRfhpq1OSguJEe+w7mqDsblfc wxvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YrZkSpIQlKCEbTRZq6CBuo0SdXjDimjtuX5xvL3YsIY=; b=kPXnOGCpUmqG9hdowl3+JtUqs8/Pr80wh7VfKz9B5EUqaiUmwevqIRasd8yjkKmZb+ G7aBUCLZVi2sn6wN7jjNIgJQuO9WGxU9TEV26ImE3liInXgX9NnYhOaDuAfdvvTxw95X wEMZwjyJBqA0I5IeiAyDHAcTaA1wqLQw22uo/oLtn9WM3gusBp/0tGI89bwPmbfsxojZ z1chPP76+tx4E21VIy/rpkjJzvzZ8O82r4tmC7SxmRjUUbIUwHWrbf3KqhOTEGFGrLLL El6UKGkWj+iWq6nnkujjW+KNgcXcbYZcSTt+GAIZeQ4FSO3NERNUCfZGxKBtOQwBcdkt WcTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWttHQ6/2Q6Oe3VMZrW1tKLtlPDUtRctiMdjn2dRuwkuMr3F4Pn gfJBpYRxltrpyt85cHPiv20/kbaqKm4rocR+D2k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4EeLxw+ACBwwcQE3UPlsILKtS2jGq4b9DlFVE3oIwDEn34DreBGiCkM7s4rhdByTo6mDQn+0tXlB0JToHyw4=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6ac2:: with SMTP id m2mr21691310otq.191.1582154969535; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de> <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SzqHnXszpEiW083NmtQAnvF8EKKvccUe9EHfjSUiAypjg@mail.gmail.com> <60DC6316-18C2-45F0-A848-CC7514309086@apple.com> <CAHw9_iJr_Zf=+gdHTmBeUuOjMFguZiktGMh1ow8k=CFnb5sSsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJr_Zf=+gdHTmBeUuOjMFguZiktGMh1ow8k=CFnb5sSsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriVCY-XugXtxSrCN76yReAXJu7-jHQTP45VULdd3h+Muqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Olli Vanhoja <olli.vanhoja@gmail.com>, dnsop WG <DNSOP@ietf.org>, Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f05896059ef628a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/mqP0Zz3tGAS-91IAA3BbcoJFhuw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:29:34 -0000
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:13 PM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:13 AM Tommy Pauly > <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 2020, at 6:15 PM, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:17 AM Olli Vanhoja <olli.vanhoja@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub. > > > > > > If someone wanted to follow this work, which GitHub repo is relevant? > > > > I found this one: https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc > > > > But I'm not sure that's the right one. > > > > > > Yes, that is the correct GitHub. > > Could I suggest adding something like: > [ RFC Editor - please remove before publication. This document is being > collaborated on in Github at: > https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc. The most > recent version of the document, open issues, etc should all be > available here. The authors (gratefully) accept pull requests.] > > to the abstract - that way, people reading the draft know where submit > PRs, etc. > W > > Seems like something worth noting in draft-ietf-git-using-github too (I scanned the two wg docs and no existing text jumped out at me). > > > > Thanks, > > Tommy > > > > > > thanks, > > Rob > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
- [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc draf… Klaus Malorny
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Olli Vanhoja
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tommy Pauly
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Rob Sayre
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tommy Pauly
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Erik Kline
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Erik Nygren
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Klaus Malorny
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Benno Overeinder
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Klaus Malorny
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Dan York
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Klaus Malorny
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Klaus Malorny
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Erik Nygren
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Ben Schwartz
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Andrew M. Hettinger
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Olli Vanhoja
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Erik Nygren
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Andrew M. Hettinger
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Dan York
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Anthony Eden
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] [External] status of the aname and sv… Andrew M. Hettinger
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc … Tony Finch