IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 25 February 2020 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7593A1648 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:27:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crB-jejgAUzL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B189A3A1649 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:27:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:57950) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1j6O4X-000ehR-Sg (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:27:37 +0000
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:27:37 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8Coe8D1ECfrRwRUnzJ3azyJfXXUq3HMy63AL-4SOvmaaw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2002250026470.27562@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de> <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com> <3ead518d-f166-1c36-c3e9-18aeb355d160@pletterpet.nl> <20200220221517.GA16177@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2002222349530.27562@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAH1iCiq+rOxs9c8zoJhAWbB6-0SP_WC5onF-DrbekwX=8iR49Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+nkc8Coe8D1ECfrRwRUnzJ3azyJfXXUq3HMy63AL-4SOvmaaw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zHZcCpVU7QA31KBYgo8eYj9fV90>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:27:41 -0000

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote:

> Just my opinion, but I would like to focus on HTTPSSVC first, for a quick
> win.  Then work on ANAME - it might not be used much anytime soon,

ANAME has been widely deployed in various forms for many years.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Dover, Wight, Portland, Plymouth: West 5 to 7, increasing gale 8 later,
occasionally severe gale 9 in Portland and Plymouth, and perhaps in Wight.
Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough except in Dover, then becoming
very rough or high later in west Portland and in Plymouth. Squally showers.
Good, occasionally poor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email