IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFE2120408 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YAsFfK26dy1 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [162.150.44.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E7A120340 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190220p; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1553884256; x=2417797856; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EsobbngSzuFxFNwbFIGNMPpGvHKDZ5pCAJ1EwdO0qww=; b=wp/8yiN2j3j9UUjCEUEO5wEK812o8ohGf2uM1Gp393QkbTdmQcfWns1CAO6TlYCG FHIuBw5Hr9aZ+poUFtuAa/4yX86mQTT7PbZAhcLkuBgD6UV290f9c/2TicUl4lri ItrAg0FW09I95k4F5vFLHUAIMpdU3xeJ5uxN0kjOq0O+fR3TeVXRBs3Q0V6RwTTI ih+YDoCGlWZXwXyOkEg7TepeXH/sOeOOuUg0e2+pLjgmNddYd7QdA3A30Wmprqzq KQeD+Wc4XuPnub7qHwP7axlmDCFKfH3nfjcNYjHxOIoFEq/qNpdLmL95p9RBPCxg lOgPYPDYbNPBQ82Ehyu4/pos1zzCuKUWatE0d0l10g5Zzq4PKkkPbOWUwnziDEiI IINHLAWOsZe0M7O0IJgY/2bETvOXqp1BV+bIVRlTzw2uKrAmlJaixgxBztxc5P2l FjaU8Fd74RZYaBAX4u1rEsrmb6f17P9/I77jRSQiTOu8NeElvCFuPwkMVtT8x7AJ 9mbGKW7mCwDGtyJAbeP12H5JSyJH9s9Zv2aPQHagA05031T+pgHr5UtUu4ZlDb6c EGvL/JNnHendCyYWnWsxlKQ5SfXIhIbQvS7pSDGP/QJWgerxUxNkukz0395TfTl/ NFnkOsrve4ObXfbVdT9J5vT+wdXQZSte8wK3AwKGWD4=;
X-AuditID: a2962c47-3475d9e000001275-9f-5c9e645f55e2
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 2A.1F.04725.F546E9C5; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:30:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:30:56 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:30:56 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH
Thread-Index: AQHU5H3+TKCHj3Ms1kiNknptws9ehaYjRe2A
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:30:56 +0000
Message-ID: <9E5DEDE1-14C1-48AA-B2EC-85A8CC20CBE7@cable.comcast.com>
References: <CABcZeBOk5bM+3G2Jd3Lu33Z08gc=AeoZ8UFHzN6AYk4f_hjZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOk5bM+3G2Jd3Lu33Z08gc=AeoZ8UFHzN6AYk4f_hjZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.0.190309
x-originating-ip: [96.115.73.253]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CF219A7C35973145BD914E07F14AAAF9@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprNKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsm5CyrwYg+fyFtfuXmSzWPH6HLsD k8eSJT+ZPCY/bmMOYIpqYLQpyShKTSxxSU1LzStOteNSwAA2Salp+UWprolFOZVBqTmpidiV gVSmpOZklqUW6WM1Rh+rOQldTBkdz9+xFcxhr7iwpo+5gbGFvYuRk0NCwETi4t/5zF2MXBxC AruYJHpevWGEcFqYJP50zoPKnGaU+DX9LVgLm4CZxN2FV5hBbBEBc4lPU6czgtjCAloSP548 ZYOIa0u8OXaMHcI2kli7rh8sziKgKnFg2zEmEJtXwEXifuMnMFtIIEBi6YQ1YDM5BQIlbl08 AxZnFBCT+H5qDZjNLCAucevJfCaIswUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyPFcQWFdCX2LjpKBtEXFFi34cV QDUcQL2aEut36UOMsZI4vPQ0I4StKDGl+yE7xDmCEidnPmGBaBWXOHxkB+sERolZSDbPQpg0 C8mkWUgmzUIyaQEj6ypGXkMzIz1DUwM9ExM9c8NNjMAks2iajvsOxg/nYw8xCnAwKvHw3g2Z FyPEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhDfm89wYId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rxe7+fECAmkJ5ak ZqemFqQWwWSZODilGhgta0JaPi627OZa93v9BIakiMubF1+rf39fIMfS99+5AKFpigmn9nwL W7NXgEdpm26Dz2pzlrRnzAXJ/3RP2BYE/z9aIrQ1rmCjssv2F59CYgvlHdLF/SO0j+n8O+hU aXmt5t7R31mnu4WuLnoVxJko9ON70iK7m3/nJ075cvC/cWXLYYnL894osRRnJBpqMRcVJwIA dWnwsC4DAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/KWvPghs6n-bWUNl5YthZcnDfcM8>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:31:02 -0000

> [2] Many networks redirect NXDOMAIN to a search/advertising page.

[JL] This is a reply on this somewhat minor point because NXDOMAIN was also raised at the side meeting. I wonder if folks have more specific references to networks that are *currently* engaged in NXDOMAIN redirection. My sense is that this practice was largely fallen by the wayside as a result of being overtaken by the browser-based omnibox function that launched several years ago and the resulting change in user behavior to just type search terms into the address bar and then click on search results. In any case, curious to know if there's a list of ISPs currently doing this.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email