Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 27 March 2019 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902EE1202FF for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwpP_82Ocfil for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27A51202FC for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:39244) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1h9BTU-000KUX-1O (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:32:24 +0000
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:32:24 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPUh6x=D+GfKg11+4bRouZdm1LcZvLm1jd4UUEJA832BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903271629430.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CABcZeBOk5bM+3G2Jd3Lu33Z08gc=AeoZ8UFHzN6AYk4f_hjZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPUh6x=D+GfKg11+4bRouZdm1LcZvLm1jd4UUEJA832BQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903271631111.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/sAt-tVB4ebA5jBeCTuj2v0LQ2FQ>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:32:28 -0000

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
>     4. At any time, the user will have the option to select a
>     different resolver out of the list, specify their own resolver, or
>     disable DoH entirely.

Will Firefox inform its users whether the local resolver supports DoT or
DoH?

> However, there are two more restricted cases in which we do think some
> network control of the resolver is reasonable.

What about allowing Firefox users to access private / internal domain
names?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
each generation is responsible for the fate of our planet