IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 13 July 2013 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BEE21F9A4C for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.469, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VvGH5l2NT46w for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BB011E80D3 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16179 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2013 02:01:59 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Jul 2013 02:01:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51e0b517.xn--hew.k1307; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=UTOFRUe6i73L1/FlD8zUbvGwpwcddF0szHgCdXSh3Og=; b=ZSQtZ8BXAv+pd1+gvmQjHj6E4TPIybm53OKibie91QYIyRGIOO58lGBolxTy/ZrSL37F8wxKtRcbeMOodI24Vs5M0hpfZHSE1iRCqHQXN+0uNlVAjxVBATV7xUqJAkV4eKBKmJanug0n8fmRsqPiGelvehw4DkcaGIKvD+msJD0epYaZ7J3TdPjc1ywebDxtJIPcBsipHBJvUyjG+wtP+S3i7CQ539eL2Nglaard9V4+uG71iI3/auM5kl51jjSI
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51e0b517.xn--hew.k1307; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=UTOFRUe6i73L1/FlD8zUbvGwpwcddF0szHgCdXSh3Og=; b=kkMNanctKQyZlatySdxx292HGtXzvRVyoT4ysbGXm90xCIEZZ9gfxMCkyT3p0Zq4an4Vl45gEAiDGoWqy2ggx+St5ljoVJtQi38EhQSs5CywuOunBHlSR3wTs2oxGqQIlqAGC45rIhGKgOTvh0DHdG9O4lHNf0HiHYB3LqnG8WBLAyzYeAVGdaU7hzbuljek1HUCpiqFk//v01AbUp+LWCAdlQR+HouPSkRJEHZuzidrvRk6vFQZvHtwriKgnLN/
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 02:01:37 -0000
Message-ID: <20130713020137.14506.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: domainrep@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa8zQth_jvMeyxH-RWVLngW47JFXVa0fdWqmvFQ76Ai8g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 02:02:18 -0000

>(1) "rater-authenticity" has been changed to "well-behaved"

I guess it's OK, but it seems awfully specific to spam filtering.

My canonical application for repute was always restaurant reviews, so
I could have my resto finder retrieve ratings from Yelp, Zagat, or
Urbanspoon.

Does a high well-behaved score mean that if you go to a restaurant and
get food poisoning, you probably won't if you go back?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email