IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emailcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-03

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 01 August 2022 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF99C157B3F for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=oQsAB7BB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=MGGBDIvJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id erIrXeeWEGMp for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5A2C14F72E for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 78518 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2022 19:22:15 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1326d.62e827e7.k2208; bh=a7bgnyyJUNBiqnDRxSa5/3BjUCYmOndvUWKKC3Pu6SE=; b=oQsAB7BBXVUrBgAat8uLmSAuOr2nMPmaMNq53byFLS/0YPzdeq/7jifXtDXuYNCYNFEMX6p1rOUrm5rByJZV1Jc1EXFj8x8LfPwr2uKj8VofAg8rnJ9/jkKcQRIJKTwbbyzxoUxNuQZGLoqWdIwGyndlYsk1/JO2gYz6IiN+IgnPbN7dcezOfXSuqFTXT7RBCcABTpc5CUv4IMPmshpURDWWRKCN9AIQroXyQhoJ7mvxbBJhO/7+G9Xz5fJp5o48EX6R8YNQWC0azzqqL11+Csk53AAAur3ErIdsyd1twnHcE/6kBrqsCB3N5akTC5qFq4MDS3tresDzAJedOrTxrQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1326d.62e827e7.k2208; bh=a7bgnyyJUNBiqnDRxSa5/3BjUCYmOndvUWKKC3Pu6SE=; b=MGGBDIvJ5a6OpbAWNqGFbAwJxHyARA9B8EXE5Cx8wHz75Exc0jmaZ8+JboIA7RTf4EyZw4PTO3gVW7l2mDhWHeH6pr9FjNAcSWD8kS5RDlx4u+g6kxO7W6mAzRmQ9TQoN4Bta6yyZ5Z2NnL5YP7JWjWKxAtDE5oK9a/u6D42wqLjaQqXtNBgbvvEP86ZfekgZbXSkZbkV4PJqcf2JocCNvAdNDeIZ0nAHH9foxP8K6kFbh/MEV0VQ7rbp4HgutyhOcdN88Q+3giqoEtCuScomqTxCT/oH0Zb4bGxLq3TvDEhog6RqWSpecX8w8A/7BNm6vLgvuxXkqPg9S8g4A1weQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 01 Aug 2022 19:22:14 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A827C46EDCD5; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 15:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 15:22:14 -0400
Message-Id: <20220801192214.A827C46EDCD5@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20220801174340.tQBME%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/-G8TLXi0crgmh1OyTMNmxmItEfc>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-03
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 19:22:22 -0000

It appears that Steffen Nurpmeso  <steffen@sdaoden.eu> said:
>The user wants me to forcefully overwrite the local timezone
>and instead use UTC in cases where second precision is required,
>as RFC 5322 only supports minute precision, ...

When I look at the ABNF on page 15 of RFC 5322, I see that it
allows seconds in all timestamps in any timezone.  The seconds
are optional but always permitted.

Can you explain why you think it doesn't?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email