IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emailcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-03

Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> Wed, 03 August 2022 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB710C14792A for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YbRIzlDPNxa1 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618C8C14F692 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kent.sdaoden.eu (kent.sdaoden.eu [192.0.2.2]) by sdaoden.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED2C16059; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:56:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by kent.sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FDB392C53; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 23:56:52 +0200
Author: Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
From: Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
To: emailcore@ietf.org, hjp@hjp.at
Message-ID: <20220803215652.nmiPj%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20220803195429.CF288470D3D3@ary.qy>
References: <20220803195429.CF288470D3D3@ary.qy>
Mail-Followup-To: emailcore@ietf.org, hjp@hjp.at
User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.24-282-gfb47a7f660
OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt
BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs.
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/g571oTwj43sT_YKI_WVjEvH8ALI>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-03
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 21:56:59 -0000

John Levine wrote in
 <20220803195429.CF288470D3D3@ary.qy>:
 |It appears that Peter J. Holzer  <hjp@hjp.at> said:
 |>What additional words would you propose and why would you think that
 |>those words would have persuaded the Exim maintainer when the existing
 |>words did not?
 |
 |I think Jeremy is on this list.  I don't always agree with his design
 |decisions, but I can always see there is a sensible basis for them.

Let's just hope he does not revert the fix as such!
The idea to switch to UTC if local time would cause the resulting
date to be recognized falsely (and if only by a minute) on the
receiver side in practice is what i will follow and implement.  It
is the right thing to do.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email