IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #14: G.7.8. Review different size limits

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 16 July 2021 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AF23A3BBD for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFJZYZek8b0U for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cross.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (cross.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B0B13A3BB3 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766DF840050; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:56:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io (100-105-161-168.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.105.161.168]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4E015840074; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io (35.45.192.35.bc.googleusercontent.com [35.192.45.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by 100.105.161.168 (trex/6.3.3); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:56:23 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Attack-Continue: 449fb3a90d951056_1626450983689_512634723
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1626450983689:4098980566
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1626450983688
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.62.181]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by smtp.hostinger.com (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 78574310E138; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:56:21 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1626450982; bh=LorAwOMMk1LPBk9Wmnh5K7z2agzHsrOT0sATQRw+vU4=; h=Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=UeqxWVIY4Lz2AQefPxRaGeHQAnzUt0leL6Ji/hAoVuzo7lFNYzDrKnYJULI8ezqxx sRBwJ5uIuLC7FI9muZcqzqz70GhlvYLpSOMiIGcqWmLX46IemJtib3gOocs3CedtVB PZ8u9y+PtJbEO2WCXPKtXO13X7NQyO7BU7AglfqE1nXFzPJ2foFSlN469+QhKavi1J bu5Zxf80FbHwVGQKq8SCaPCIRWU0+3z10IK6zxrvdSy8xolmNcWpwNnrKX8gfMLT7A XKuLY5ylhKZaNPmmBbbcIodfiSjq/aKV7LtECfJn+qLRnNyd+ZpJuVsdLwkayDRmwp d3y+s2pYrCg6w==
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>, emailcore@ietf.org
References: <20210715221921.C6E9F239F6B6@ary.qy> <8b551cf1-131b-cf43-5e61-cabf6fb9e2e6@tana.it> <01S1GPHZJUWQ005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <af9b647f-bf21-82f9-174c-5c9698460f26@linuxmagic.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <8144001a-d72c-0aa9-aa8b-9957d1ebe2d0@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:56:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <af9b647f-bf21-82f9-174c-5c9698460f26@linuxmagic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/O3w0DcbRTN2CwaMtwIZQCDf2LZU>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #14: G.7.8. Review different size limits
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:56:31 -0000

On 7/16/2021 8:52 AM, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Vote against changing existing limits, it is not just MTA's that have to 
> deal with this, but many email analytics programs etc..


+1

Unless I missed it in the thread, I didn't see any documentation of a 
serious problem that needs fixing, nevermind a serious benefit to be 
obtained, but it's clear changing limits imposes a systemic effect, 
which the current effort seeks to minimize.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email