[Emailcore] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Re: Re: Your (Roman's) DISCUSS on draft-ietf-emailcore-as and status of the document

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ted,

[Cc trimmed]

At 04:10 PM 24-09-2026, Ted Lemon wrote:
>My concern is not for the privacy of corporate email.

The scenario which you gave was for mail between two sites, Fastmail 
and IETF.  The headers in one of your emails show that x25519 was 
used for the key exchange and ECDSA P-256 was used as the server 
signature.  mx.ietf.org injected information in the headers stating 
that DKIM and SPF checks were successful.  As a quick reply, I'd say 
that everything looks okay.

You mentioned privacy in the comment.  I'll view it as what people 
out there say when they mention that word.  The email could have been 
sent securely but it is not necessarily private.  There is some 
filtering which occurs between sender and receiver.  You would be 
receiving too many offers about products which you need if the mail 
traffic was unfiltered.  There are reporting loops where information 
from the email is shared.  My guess is that some of that happened.  I 
would have to take a closer look to say whether it could be a concern or not.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy