RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?

Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com> Tue, 20 July 2004 12:58 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA16489 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:58:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bmu8v-0002V0-2n; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:54:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BmtrV-000562-O2 for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:36:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA14923 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:36:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.thingmagic.com ([207.31.248.245] helo=thingmagic.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bmtrd-0007gk-B0 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:36:58 -0400
Received: from [24.61.30.237] (account margaret HELO [10.0.0.78]) by thingmagic.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 115115; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:34:00 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: margaret@mail.thingmagic.com
Message-Id: <p0602045bbd22bffe9954@[10.0.0.78]>
In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504D06794@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504D06794@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:32:33 -0400
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, entmib@ietf.org
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

At 12:06 PM +0200 7/20/04, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>>  - Status of the "Definitions of Supplemental Entity Managed
>>    Objects" draft
>>         GOALS:  Technical review & decision about how/if to
>>                 move forward
>>
>
>I'd reather change "Technical review" into something aka "Come to
>resolution about the one oustanding issue."
>
>This debate has been going on for I don't know how long now.

I agree, and your suggestion sounds reasonable to me.

If we can close on the one issue with the draft, Dan Romascanu (who 
has already volunteered) can do a thorough review and we can get this 
document published as a sponsored individual submission without the 
need for a WG re-charter, etc.  It's only a couple of objects, after 
all!

>We better decide which solution we want.
>
>I would URGE everyone who has comments/concerns about a fix/resolution of
>the issue to SEND their proposal to the mailing list (well) BEFORE the
>SanDiego meeting, so we can discuss it and try to come to consensus.

I'll make the same plea for any remaining issues with the Entity 
State MIB.  Personally, I hope that we will leave San Diego with 
either:

     (1) A set of well-defined edits that are required before we send 
the Entity State MIB to the IESG.

OR

     (2) A decision not to proceed with the Entity State MIB at all.

We've spent _far_ to long nibbling at this MIB, and we should either 
ship it or kill it, IMO.

As I think I've said on this list before, it is heavily frowned upon 
for an IESG member to chair a regular WG, and I only continued as 
chair because we were supposed to finish in a few months.  That was 
over a year ago!  No one else has volunteered to run the group, and 
(as a working group, not as individual people) I think we are 
suffering classic signs of having outlived our own usefulness.  So 
let's finish up (one way or the other) and close down.

Thanks,
Margaret




_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib