[Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Mon, 25 October 2004 06:30 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23313 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:30:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyaD-0006oO-KX for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:43:57 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyLF-0003X2-0c; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:28:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyJp-0003Nq-7s for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:27:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23053 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyXD-0006kG-PQ for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:40:52 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CLyJt-0000sV-8J for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:27:05 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:47:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000088485@mail.gsu.cn>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:22:49 +0800
Message-ID: <01a001c4ba5b$57078f40$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, <avri@psg.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0257921F@orsmsx408>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:24:53 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c3a18ef96977fc9bcc21a621cbf1174b
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43

It's really a misunderstanding. Avri, pls change back.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
Subject: RE: 01-8


Avri,

You definitely misunderstood me, I did not ask you at add all our names
in the front page...just asked you to add our addresses in the
end...what gave you this impression ? I know it's a bit late your time,
but pls reverse this...i did not ask for it.

Thanks and sorry if I said something which caused this confusion,

Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:10 PM
To: Khosravi, Hormuzd M
Cc: Weiming Wang; forces-protocol@ietf.org; Ligang Dong; Robert Haas;
ram.gopal@nokia.com; Jamal Hadi Salim
Subject: 01-8

http://psg.com/~avri/forces/draft/draft-ietf-forces-protocol-01-8.txt

On 25 okt 2004, at 01.33, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:

> Avri,
>
> I am back and here is a list of quick changes...
>
> Acknowledgments - pls move this to the end of the draft as Jamal
> suggested, doesn't seem fair to the authors I think.

done.
don't see the fairness issue, but i have moved as per your instructions.

>
> Author Addresses - pls add all our names and address along with yours
> and Remove Appendix A. You can get most of it from the Requirements
RFC
> (I am surprised no one noticed this before, including myself:))

can't add the addresses without the header as far as i know - certainly
can't in xml. the only addresses that belong in the address section in
the end are the ones in the header and are the ones that need to be
contacted during 48 hours.

i have added all the names to the header as per your instructions.

>
> Section 7.1 -> Replace State maintenance msg in the text With Config
> msg
> Replace
>                   |    S.M. Activate FE   |
>                   |<----------------------|
> With
>                   |  Config-Activate FE   |
>                   |<----------------------|
>
> Section 7.2 ->
> Replace
>                     |   S.M. FE Deactivate  |
>                     |<----------------------|
> With
>                     |  Config-FE Deactivate |
>                     |<----------------------|
>
>

done

> The author addresses moving around is important and fair to all of us
> who have contributed a lot to this protocol.
>

is this a different instruction the the one you gave me in the
beginning of this note?

a.




_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol