[Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8

avri@psg.com Mon, 25 October 2004 06:28 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23186 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyYX-0006mO-TN for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:42:14 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyJx-0003Pl-3T; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:27:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyGA-0001R6-RV for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:23:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA22477 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:23:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: avri@psg.com
Received: from tla.crepundia.net ([194.71.127.149] helo=report.tla-group.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyTY-0006eb-4t for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:37:05 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (report.tla-group.com [194.71.127.149]) by report.tla-group.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i9P5wWep000916; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:58:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0257921F@orsmsx408>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0257921F@orsmsx408>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <561F7F38-264E-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:23:07 -0400
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10d3e4e3c32e363f129e380e644649be
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b5d20af10c334b36874c0264b10f59f1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

can't have the addresses in the back without having them in the front.  
i have just spent the last hour adding them.  now you want me to remove 
them?

a.

On 25 okt 2004, at 02.19, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:

> Avri,
>
> You definitely misunderstood me, I did not ask you at add all our names
> in the front page...just asked you to add our addresses in the
> end...what gave you this impression ? I know it's a bit late your time,
> but pls reverse this...i did not ask for it.
>
> Thanks and sorry if I said something which caused this confusion,
>
> Hormuzd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:10 PM
> To: Khosravi, Hormuzd M
> Cc: Weiming Wang; forces-protocol@ietf.org; Ligang Dong; Robert Haas;
> ram.gopal@nokia.com; Jamal Hadi Salim
> Subject: 01-8
>
> http://psg.com/~avri/forces/draft/draft-ietf-forces-protocol-01-8.txt
>
> On 25 okt 2004, at 01.33, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
>
>> Avri,
>>
>> I am back and here is a list of quick changes...
>>
>> Acknowledgments - pls move this to the end of the draft as Jamal
>> suggested, doesn't seem fair to the authors I think.
>
> done.
> don't see the fairness issue, but i have moved as per your 
> instructions.
>
>>
>> Author Addresses - pls add all our names and address along with yours
>> and Remove Appendix A. You can get most of it from the Requirements
> RFC
>> (I am surprised no one noticed this before, including myself:))
>
> can't add the addresses without the header as far as i know - certainly
> can't in xml. the only addresses that belong in the address section in
> the end are the ones in the header and are the ones that need to be
> contacted during 48 hours.
>
> i have added all the names to the header as per your instructions.
>
>>
>> Section 7.1 -> Replace State maintenance msg in the text With Config
>> msg
>> Replace
>>                   |    S.M. Activate FE   |
>>                   |<----------------------|
>> With
>>                   |  Config-Activate FE   |
>>                   |<----------------------|
>>
>> Section 7.2 ->
>> Replace
>>                     |   S.M. FE Deactivate  |
>>                     |<----------------------|
>> With
>>                     |  Config-FE Deactivate |
>>                     |<----------------------|
>>
>>
>
> done
>
>> The author addresses moving around is important and fair to all of us
>> who have contributed a lot to this protocol.
>>
>
> is this a different instruction the the one you gave me in the
> beginning of this note?
>
> a.
>
>


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol