IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3851A08DF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uItOxv9_xJyo for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279051A078F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.112] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AF82789491; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:19:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_27E9154F-AD15-4E4D-847E-75C5915581E3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <084501cf647c$b1e9b700$15bd2500$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:19:08 -0400
Message-Id: <019935C0-A625-4E68-AC32-2614BED7E1F8@lucidvision.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E5726@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <f9e2fcab904e4a368ec04a5f694b48b0@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <084501cf647c$b1e9b700$15bd2500$@olddog.co.uk>
To: Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/-hsPDBD52yJD7q833OSQ3h-6MTw
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:19:15 -0000

ACK

On Apr 30, 2014:10:01 AM, at 10:01 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Christer,
> 
> Thanks for your efforts.
> 
>> Editorial nits:
>>  
>> Section 1 (Introduction):
>> ---------------------------------
>>  
>> Q_1:
>> 
>> s/”two MIB modules”/”two Management Information Base (MIB) modules”
> 
> Note that "MIB" is found as "well known" at
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt
>  
> Authors, please do not make this change.
>  
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email