IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Thu, 01 May 2014 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC791A6F1E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 07:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MndqJWP12aYF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 07:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEB71A0900 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 07:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.112] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F27278B74F; Thu, 1 May 2014 10:56:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BAF073E6-3936-488D-8265-36388AA9511A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E785C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 10:56:06 -0400
Message-Id: <D50F4FDD-525B-4CF1-937B-648ADF682F87@lucidvision.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E5726@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <f9e2fcab904e4a368ec04a5f694b48b0@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>, <084501cf647c$b1e9b700$15bd2500$@olddog.co.uk> <gfjmp10isq90fl30al44p0hq.1398867874137@email.android.com>, <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3941E118B02@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E785C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/TVmsQUv2Z7fpN6Tu9Y2sZfIyEkg
Cc: Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 14:56:12 -0000

On May 1, 2014:10:45 AM, at 10:45 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Nobo
> 
>>> Section 1 (Introduction):
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Q_1:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> s/"two MIB modules"/"two Management Information Base (MIB) modules"
>> 
>> Authors had an offline discussion about this one, and concluded that the term is sufficiently well known and modification is not required.
> 
> I am ok with that.
> 
> But, as I said earlier, shouldn't you then remove "Management Information Base" from the Abstract section, and only use "MIB" there too?

	No. The abstracts should not contain acronyms that are undefined, as they are often extracted and used for other things.  This is the same thinking around why we expand acronyms inside of MIB descriptions, and do not allow references, but instead require explicit RFC/document names. 

	--Tom


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email