IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 01 May 2014 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6458C1A06DB for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 14:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bU5hQcvLawL6 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 14:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5581A0979 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 14:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f798c6d000001521-17-5362ba667d13
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 37.13.05409.66AB2635; Thu, 1 May 2014 23:19:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.191]) by ESESSHC014.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.60]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 1 May 2014 23:19:34 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06
Thread-Index: Ac9kXmZkqLpMSYwHT0aMT2C9XEwyyQFpj2wVmhlwdTDl24YX3f//qIHggAHvJg///+HyAIAAi4US
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 21:19:33 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E8215@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E5726@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <f9e2fcab904e4a368ec04a5f694b48b0@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>, <084501cf647c$b1e9b700$15bd2500$@olddog.co.uk> <gfjmp10isq90fl30al44p0hq.1398867874137@email.android.com>, <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3941E118B02@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2E785C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <D50F4FDD-525B-4CF1-937B-648ADF682F87@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <D50F4FDD-525B-4CF1-937B-648ADF682F87@lucidvision.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Rjd9V1KwwdS1rBY/em4wW2z59ZXR 4uqrzywWszviLR5OvsTuwOox5fdGVo8lS34yeWx9soTdY8XmlYweXy5/ZgtgjeKySUnNySxL LdK3S+DKuPFlCnPBEc6KhQ83sTUwXmDvYuTkkBAwkZjYNIsNwhaTuHBvPZDNxSEkcJRR4sTz PiYIZzGjxM3zD5m7GDk42AQsJLr/aYM0iAhoS0zsa2UGqWEWuM4osX/NQrAaYQFziRvvoyBq LCTOHwZpBbGjJK4u+skIYrMIqEismXaHCcTmFfCVuNe/jxFi10FmiZOLH4FdxCngLLG24xVY MyPQdd9PrQFrYBYQl7j1ZD4TxNUCEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwphK0rsPNvODFGvI7Fg9yc2CFtb YtnC18wQiwUlTs58wjKBUWwWkrGzkLTMQtIyC0nLAkaWVYyixanFSbnpRsZ6qUWZycXF+Xl6 eaklmxiBsXdwy2/VHYyX3zgeYhTgYFTi4S3+EhksxJpYVlyZe4hRmoNFSZz3yy2fYCGB9MSS 1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2M1r7CS+5YKYYnuxxtazjdo3LyTslN/08uZ/su+oW4TzNk E/kqmFqWKSOuOu9Bof83l9QLTK++lxqpXr96M7Ru4tb2YEODkpB5NyMF/G0/5slZaufMXvw8 5llOduGKYB4HloLizNeeV1fckuzVu77tLde++qC9zm/nvZF7WL1Q6tqLf+cf819QYinOSDTU Yi4qTgQApt4PMp4CAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/dKBIGRu7hz0tUKYlwXI4BzUP1sk
Cc: Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 21:19:39 -0000

Hi,

>>>> Section 1 (Introduction):
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Q_1:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> s/"two MIB modules"/"two Management Information Base (MIB) modules"
>>>
>>> Authors had an offline discussion about this one, and concluded that the term is sufficiently well known and modification is not required.
>>
>> I am ok with that.
>>
>> But, as I said earlier, shouldn't you then remove "Management Information Base" from the Abstract section, and only use "MIB" there too?
>
> No. The abstracts should not contain acronyms that are undefined, as they are often extracted and used for other things.  This is the same 
> thinking around why we expand acronyms inside of MIB descriptions, and do not allow references, but instead require explicit RFC/document 
> names.

My understanding is that well known terms don't need to be expanded in the Abstract either. But, I can of course be wrong.

Anyway, this is just a very minor nit, so no need to spend time arguing about it. I am happy that you changed the security consideration sentence I was commenting on, and as far as I am concerned the document is ready for publication :)

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email