Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Joel,

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:30:31PM -0800, Joel Halpern wrote:
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2018-01-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-11
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-25
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
>     Although ID-Nits does not complain about it, I can find no reference to
>     RFCs 2119 or 8174.  Some of the uses of "must" int he document are along
>     the lines of "inherently follows", which is not normative language.  But
>     other uses are clearly normative in structure.   It is unclear why the
>     reference to RFC 2119 was removed as part of this update.

Thanks for the review -- I'm a bit surprised that id-nits does not
complain about the omission.

I do not know why the -00 dropped that clause, but it does seem like
the current normal text citing 8174 should be added before
publication.

-Ben