Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Ben.  That would be good.
Yours,
Joel

On 1/2/18 8:38 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:30:31PM -0800, Joel Halpern wrote:
>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
>> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06
>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>> Review Date: 2018-01-02
>> IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-11
>> IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-25
>>
>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC
>>
>> Major issues: None
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>      Although ID-Nits does not complain about it, I can find no reference to
>>      RFCs 2119 or 8174.  Some of the uses of "must" int he document are along
>>      the lines of "inherently follows", which is not normative language.  But
>>      other uses are clearly normative in structure.   It is unclear why the
>>      reference to RFC 2119 was removed as part of this update.
> 
> Thanks for the review -- I'm a bit surprised that id-nits does not
> complain about the omission.
> 
> I do not know why the -00 dropped that clause, but it does seem like
> the current normal text citing 8174 should be added before
> publication.
> 
> -Ben
>