Re: [Gendispatch] some thoughts about ietf communication

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Thu, 29 July 2021 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47513A24CB for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbaqtYrspOt2 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D4A3A24CA for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trixy.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0QX00UJRBGMCJ5@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for gendispatch@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 09:37:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from blockhead.local ([69.12.173.8]) by trixy.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.7-x01 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0QX00063CGK0QU@trixy.bergandi.net> for gendispatch@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net ([69.12.173.8] EXTERNAL) (EHLO blockhead.local) with TLS/SSL by trixy.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.18]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:36:01 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:37:22 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
In-reply-to: <D011C9BF-3FFB-4A61-A9CE-C449DF4296B2@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Message-id: <93dfcdb3-3d32-6ef5-70f9-57a56f9aaa40@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_l0+H+gnWSCEJVYZo3wPPLg)"
Content-language: en-US
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=trixy.bergandi.net, send-ip=69.12.173.8)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net [69.12.173.8] (EHLO blockhead.local)
References: <ee2a840d-1837-1e06-647e-1251295c94bb@lear.ch> <D011C9BF-3FFB-4A61-A9CE-C449DF4296B2@akamai.com>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [210725] (trixy.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/AprgrIDey4WubOVfuDD1PlEEQKQ>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] some thoughts about ietf communication
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:37:28 -0000

   Rich,

   It is very easy to misconstrue a statement that says that the biggest
problem is when it's too easy for the general public to speak and how
it's much better when getting up to speak was much harder.

   In fact, it's very easy to take that as elitist and a call to clamp
down on the free speech of others. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way
but it sure sounds that way to this tin ear. Maybe try and rephrase?

   Dan.

On 7/29/21 7:12 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> I think the biggest problem with previous plenaries is that it is too 
> easy for the general public to get on a soapbox, er the microphone line.
>
> I think think that the plenary that happened a 12 hours ago, as well 
> as the other “remote only” ones, went much better. I attribute it to 
> the fact that getting up to speak was much harder, but maybe there’s 
> another reason.
>
>

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius