Re: [Gendispatch] some thoughts about ietf communication

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 30 July 2021 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1C33A276A for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbGHPNiC0fuZ for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECAA63A2768 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFF832003CE for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:45:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=9ewPtM wycxYCRdsjFRr9fgaL4tj83QARn+0UlVPI7CQ=; b=OWZR9D8x2ikLQVHBSo3UwM sNiXzfD9qt9Hm6lzF65BdiQgJaoP1gef2aEINULjv9yALZCj0SCOlmjMBDRLJ4TM e6yp2c++GpfK9dImrPnElYWR49X3VgeF6YhUFubxphu3Tw+GV3HujnNirvYk6FCa Z1q9QJRaJcfsbseeYmeh0ie8tjoUdZd+UQszJ51rqEc6CA64OosPnBdHe5hopxT0 i3tjFfsew3TOCb/Q9OcZ0N5y5brDvENaY9wP31IgMnu0WVnwNeb+VFHxDl+/Y9yP 9ki2igwemSCRoMKci94uqSoOM+FjbD84zAIi7kYtFSK6cYBmxCye1x9Nc7XUUKcQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Z-YDYY84dd0-YH5Yo-UJwinHVvX_XsbjfbyHmZK4VtX62SpBQGo9Gw> <xme:Z-YDYQurgwlyZcOGY3f0tOqirCABbqhrTKuMK9gmXABfL3pEMhqoSUZ39P_OiqCok ArhZceMzzNulw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Z-YDYeANQIju359fxsZoHdRf2ur_JXpocFDNCN8sI_OSLo6OynpiD-DiseDHmnBcM9may3KXsP8tr8f0ddh__8MssGv6rAVM_dVdT8zbUA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheehgdegtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderre dtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfeetudeigedtle dvvddtudefjeejffdvfeetjeeiueelgfdtgfegtdffkeetudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqd hhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Z-YDYYeUIN9_HBT_BehIH7YHGvNmFu3tq3Qwn077pbp3-KGKItSQ0A> <xmx:Z-YDYdNLCIEovBzersWpL_oc57-sVTM2Zzq9cmS7yyGW4tYqTS0jNQ> <xmx:Z-YDYSl3EsbuzP4Z_QPTpGMjgVPQ10YRjH-CVfP0ppzc60JfKV5png> <xmx:aOYDYTaGOOSg_muK2o010McBKnplWvUgXOOCTsnF6YHTkjx9aZLcOA>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:45:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <ee2a840d-1837-1e06-647e-1251295c94bb@lear.ch> <D011C9BF-3FFB-4A61-A9CE-C449DF4296B2@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <72e82e93-457f-e289-16b7-6be8393864ea@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:45:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D011C9BF-3FFB-4A61-A9CE-C449DF4296B2@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------38A54970DD3DDFB22EB72F51"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/TRp5hQqKHuKscA-VPMOylk1iYD8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] some thoughts about ietf communication
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:45:51 -0000

On 7/29/21 10:12 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:

> I think the biggest problem with previous plenaries is that it is too 
> easy for the general public to get on a soapbox, er the microphone line.
>
IMO, this is a sign of strength.   An organization that can tolerate 
input from anyone can have a conscience, can be self-correcting. Even if 
listening to such input is often tiring, occasionally such input is 
quite valuable.   I don't know of any effective way of filtering out the 
less-valuable input without also filtering the more-valuable input.

Keith