Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment]
John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 05 August 2010 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6A63A67F5 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKV6szKihL3m for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD723A6800 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o75FdM6e027595 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:39:22 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1281022762; bh=rJ64vDEt7NLQINUXTOxIwQBTCNU=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=cQZov5feXde1nvmxwWeJtMRcznFjMi0uI4lT64h6roeKSufBotFLLM8c0cgfwyD/u gy+AdaBxj4/d59CJ72OKQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id: subject:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=eKnzsMJUSq6ddz5c+yPTcBWEyCvHiG7RFThbrb4wfgpF8Wwn7XSBBsQrDJwHTdUqH wDVE4MdhGbEM+ZPK4X5CQ==
Received: from gwb11 (gwb11.prod.google.com [10.200.2.11]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o75FdLn5022766 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:39:22 -0700
Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so2829959gwb.18 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.130.15 with SMTP id h15mr12547303ybn.378.1281022758262; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.60.3 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2286.1281017237.786534@puncture>
References: <AANLkTinyrDoG5d_Ur6HVRy=SgMPjLzJtpJ++Ye=1DQdj@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008040050040.5947@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <1280932393.7561.271.camel@tng> <2286.1281017237.786534@puncture>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:38:58 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimWeL5Td0_H0+q+p=CpPqy-GAdhiKxqr5yyGNzL@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016368e266d7498b5048d155a14"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment]
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:38:54 -0000
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote: > On Wed Aug 4 15:33:13 2010, Patrick McManus wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 00:53 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: >> > I could see an argument for supporting >> > fragmentation in the case of multiplexing, but without that it doesn't >> > seem to actually gain us anything. >> >> In the absence of fragmentation the sender must have the entire message >> available in order to prefix the total length in the header - so it >> engages in store and forward instead of streaming behavior. >> >> >> I think some of these are bad arguments. Imagine we have frame-based compression (I know this still up for debate, though I think a good case has been made that we need to be able to compress some payloads and not others). Then the code is going to look something like this: empty output buffer while there is input data read the next buffer full (if not already in a byte array/string) while the input buffer is not empty compress the input buffer into the output buffer if output buffer is full, send a non-final frame with the output buffer and clear it advance the input buffer pointer end while end while send a final frame with the output buffer If we don't have chunking, we must buffer the entire compressed output in memory, which means allocating and reallocating an arbitrarily large buffer rather than sending each output buffer's full of data. No, because the receiver cnnot process portions of messages - at least with > our current API. And you can achieve this behaviour by sending multiple > messages anyway. For per-frame compression, you certainly can decompress each chunk as you receive it. Yes, the JS API currently does not have a way to pass partial messages, and perhaps that needs to get fixed when binary support is added since it seems more likely you will want to be able to react to partial messages as each part is received. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Thomson, Martin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Thomson, Martin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Roberto Peon
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Thomson, Martin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Patrick McManus
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Patrick McManus
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Mike Belshe
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Douglas Otis
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Patrick McManus
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Ian Hickson
- [hybi] Good arguments (was: Framing take IV) S Moonesamy
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] John Tamplin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Dave Cridland
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] John Tamplin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Jack Moffitt
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Dave Cridland
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Dave Cridland
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Yves Lafon
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Roberto Peon
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Dave Cridland
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] John Tamplin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] John Tamplin
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Scott Ferguson
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV [why fragment] Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Framing take IV Thomson, Martin