IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Framing take IV

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Wed, 04 August 2010 04:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDE23A6BB3 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEsebvUxXbT5 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7212E3A6BB4 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe18.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe18.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.82]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o744cf3r014368 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:38:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1280896721; bh=f0Na+Ugntd9eH9+iFg34+WmQlGw=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=RY5xAuWVkf9WYuCX9EdNKaijkYfliGb8IPjhBSOLj5pSPjkO631/BkpHmGDdpkT/C VnX7oeYLed4DTZSZVKX1A==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=ywzZT3EX5J8nl0Kxj5uPPdtb356zKpx0m3usunfJVXUEGjx6nDIjS2VnvY6Auu2Ow xAgp0+mCi2DjrxAD/VIqQ==
Received: from yxk30 (yxk30.prod.google.com [10.190.3.158]) by kpbe18.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o744cCC1012584 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:38:40 -0700
Received: by yxk30 with SMTP id 30so741204yxk.16 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.135.20 with SMTP id i20mr7735317ybd.62.1280896719751; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.67.19 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03EB8B01CD@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <AANLkTinyrDoG5d_Ur6HVRy=SgMPjLzJtpJ++Ye=1DQdj@mail.gmail.com> <20100804022719.GT27827@shareable.org> <AANLkTi=MENta8H4A_ota=R==EJ3j0zAkPc7ai2qmsZiT@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinZE8-HSi-BJD8Oq3z3+9BXY8eMnZ4DAnOaiuT=@mail.gmail.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03EB8B01CD@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:38:39 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-8zBw0m=Ac2uzbW4zZQ_cV5DyKrEuJV6+pMOe@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)" <ifette@google.com>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd59494f98b52048cf80149"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Framing take IV
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:38:14 -0000

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Thomson, Martin
<Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>wrote:

> ifette@google.com writes:
> > As far as I can tell, what Jamie proposed is basically equivalent to what
> I proposed
> > in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg02726.html -
>
> I like this proposal.  It got lost in the email noise the first time
> around.  It's not exactly what Jamie proposes, but it could be made
> compatible with it.
>
> +-----------------------------------------------+
> |frag(1)| ???(1)|opcode(6)| Length(24)          |
> +-----------------------------------------------+
> |      Extensions (prearranged length)          |
> +-----------------------------------------------+
> |                     Data                      |
> +-----------------------------------------------+
>
> It makes new protocol features transparent to the framing layer.  All you
> need to do is define a negotiation for the features.
>
> It's a shame that it doesn't work for multiplexing.
>
>
Assuming multiplexing is an extension, we could make it work fine. E.g. the
multiplexing extension will reserve 8 bits in the extension section, and
we're set.


> --Martin
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email