Re: [hybi] New port and Tunneling?

"Shelby Moore" <shelby@coolpage.com> Mon, 16 August 2010 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <shelby@coolpage.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8883A6994 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.498, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88IrQBUHADvM for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www5.webmail.pair.com (www5.webmail.pair.com [66.39.3.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A216A3A698E for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13428 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Aug 2010 11:20:15 -0000
Received: from 121.97.54.174 ([121.97.54.174]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user shelby@coolpage.com) by sm.webmail.pair.com with HTTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:20:14 -0400
Message-ID: <421231b93265bd6be7078a7a9d2851ba.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <e27da8ca5dcbebdf5240481c4b5be6d3.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
References: <7ffabb591b2292c9b81abecfaec3cdb6.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com> <20100815210332.GH27614@1wt.eu> <a8358c0239c686dfd4753b55c6c34385.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com> <20100815221922.GJ27614@1wt.eu> <b13c89a75303a5d97edcb78926b385be.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com> <20100815234010.GM27614@1wt.eu> <52530df7491f03990cbfffd3eb49bcb6.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com> <20100816055558.GO27614@1wt.eu> <e27da8ca5dcbebdf5240481c4b5be6d3.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:20:14 -0400
From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] New port and Tunneling?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shelby@coolpage.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:19:40 -0000

>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:24:44PM -0400, Shelby Moore wrote:
>>> My point is that at least port+tunnel will work on the more widespread
>>> use
>>> cases outside the enterprise, probably as often than HTTP Upgrade on
>>> port
>>> 80 will and with better hard fail and better performance (less quirks
>>> after tunnel succeeds).
>>
>> Noone said otherwise.
>
> Was he aware of the new technique (emulating traceroute) in the links I
> provided in the first post that started this thread, and could that change
> his analysis?

Obviously you meant "no one" not a person with a last name of "Noone"? 
Two entirely different meanings from absence of a single space.