IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18ndir] [art] New Version Notification for draft-bray-unichars-06.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 01 October 2023 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF33CC14CE31; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 10:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXuF1yqCLejq; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 10:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73546C14CE4F; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 10:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eduroam-pool10-335.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-pool10-335.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.91.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RzBbk6pXtzDCcB; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:56:34 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iuS2J0KEOYWOscVAoNthjU4G1BR-Bo+jYetBBGXjrt-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 19:56:34 +0200
Cc: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger=40team.telstra.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "i18ndir@ietf.org" <i18ndir@ietf.org>, ART Area <art@ietf.org>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 717875794.249812-31e9af94cfde9763b243e525df53c4a9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9C8BA7D-54E0-489E-88BD-E089D2EA297B@tzi.org>
References: <169566019635.41806.9804796677919971070@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6is-wU2NLXNWL56nSJ4=nKvDzGv_Aw4qJN6N2O8CuM4-yw@mail.gmail.com> <SYBPR01MB59814B3448F5754AAEDA1740E5C7A@SYBPR01MB5981.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <CAHBU6iueqtd5T1T-ciYUMWvmo8XqBQqO5LkWbdRaoXQzPYSQOQ@mail.gmail.com> <SYBPR01MB59819A9F0BDD785F74EB2855E5C7A@SYBPR01MB5981.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <CAChr6SwLcEX3Oox-CMCui+p8LQQFJBf+kG8p9WNpD8HzgXsm9Q@mail.gmail.com> <219F675E-0184-4FD9-BD48-6B62AD8A4353@tzi.org> <CAChr6SyDMHKB6p-gdS1OdJRG+X=6ozZDtT8j1hehyTvCKaskSA@mail.gmail.com> <90BF7B53-584A-44D9-824E-F2AA8BD70A94@tzi.org> <CAHBU6iuS2J0KEOYWOscVAoNthjU4G1BR-Bo+jYetBBGXjrt-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/h3XeeDrhaAZrjhiBnY3atSMy7cQ>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] [art] New Version Notification for draft-bray-unichars-06.txt
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 17:56:40 -0000

On 2023-10-01, at 19:44, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
> 
> I repeat: To inform protocol designers that it’s insufficient to say “Unicode characters” for their text fields. And, having explained why, offer reasonable alternative character repertoires.

That is approximately the reason why I wrote modern-network-unicode.
Please explain how draft-bray-unichars is more useful for this purpose.
It doesn’t even distinguish 1d from 2d applications.
That is not the level of advice I saw that people needed when I decided to write modern-network-unicode.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email